Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
you say "gay thinking" when anyone says anything that disagrees with your prior assumptions, without any real reference to reality.Dear Halohope,
Well I am just using the phrase 'gay thinking' to describe the 'rubbish' I am reading where the meaning of words used by people supporting same-sex unions doesnt even match dictionary definitions.
I hope that helps
metaphysics is structured, so your relatity doesn't match everyone elses.
And there are those who can be both physically and emotionally attracted to the same sex.
Ah no. Its just saying a gay couple would be misleading in that case. Most would thik that I was talking about a same sex couple. "Gay thinking" isn't always sexual just as straight thinking isn't always sexual. I don't define any relationship by sex. I did not say in order for someone to be couple they must have sex. I think they just need to be romanticaly involved. A couple that has a gay man and a gay woman, well, I don't think they would be romantically involved but just friends. I know a same sex couple that has yet to have sex but are nonetheless romantically involved. They are more than just friends. But enough with the word play.
If you could show me where I said that as I don't remember writing that.
sorry... which internal inconsistencies would those be?
Your deduction of ethics perhaps. You cannot deduce right or wrong only based on highly subjective experience like homosexuality.
You're the one claiming there are no conflicts in the Bible... so yes, you'd better refute them as presented (not that I've seen you credibly refute ANY yet, but, for the audience the ones in discussion currently...)
I have refuted every single "contradiction" you posted because you want it to have contradiction. Not because it has one. This is the last time I'm going to do it next time I will just tell you to take a hermanutics course since you need it. And you still haven't told me which website you are getting these supposed contradictions from, I'm guessing because you know I will demonstrate their anti-biblical bias.
Yes but you used it as an argument yet of course two people, whether of the same sex or opposite sex can be emotionally attracted to each other, without having any sexual attraction.
Exactly, you need to specify the sex of the couple not their sexual desires.
Of course you do, by describing the sex of a couple one describes whether they are man or woman, male or female, by describing them as gay describes their sexual desires, who they want to copulate with.
I guess so too but they could still be a gay couple unless by couple you mean sexually?
No I haven’t got time, if it wasn’t you it was someone else and if so please accept my apologies for misrepresenting you.
to translate “the Nephilim,” but it does not retain the clause “the sons of Anak are from the Nephilim.”I told you the website, Biblegateway.com... you can click the blue links easily enough.
No, biblegateway doesn't post contradictions. I know you are getting it from somewhere else.
the contradictions are there for all to see... but you digress... 420 = 450 talents, or is that a Biblical contradiction?
Again, where are you getting these contradictions from? Which website? Why do you insist of hidding it?
I've told you repeatedly, I use Biblegateway.com as my online source for Bible quotes. Do you disagree that the quoted passages say what I say they are saying? If so, then I understand your concern about my source, otherwise, you're just stalling because you know I've laid down a misere contradiction and you can't flabble your way out of it.
..I did? I really can't remember. I thought I was arguing that a couple that is sexually attractec to ecah other can also be emotionally attracted to each other.
Well then i'm sorry for doing so but most people knew what I meant I thought.
I mean romantically. Like as in they like each other more than just friends. It doesn't matter if they have sex or not.
I don't remember, the thread has gotten dso long. But anyways, no need for apologies
1 Kings 9:28 (King James Version)
WHAT website? I keep telling you... Biblegateway.com you can click the links yourself!
NEWGUY101 CONFIRMS CONTRADICTION IN THE BIBLE!!!
