That's the standard accusation thrown at any evidence, but so far all I have seen is repeated allegations/assertions, myth and math substituted for science, and an astounding willfull ignorance and intellectual dishonesty toward considering a preponderance of circumstantial evidence in favor of "the smoking gun".
I used to have an equally convincing figurine of a Bigfoot riding a Unicorn.People have widely (average people everywhere on Earth) known the Earth is a globe not just for 60 years, since NASA got going, but for centuries.
This one is from just before 1500:
"Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits." Matt 7:15-16
No, clearly.
I did not see any post where it was revealed why someone chose to believe the flat earth theory, instead of believing what their own declared church believes ....
No, nothing that extreme... but the principle stands. When two people can look at the same scripture and come to extremely differing conclusions, how do you discern what is right? You look at the fruit. Flat Earth fruit is not good.
No, that is not how. (as evident in this and most other threads).
Sorry? If so, you would have provided the quote. Looking through your own posts, you never did.
That's the kind of thing an idol worshiper might say.
