Just turn on your TV. That is just about all you will see, Black Violence. Even against yourselves... it's a wonder there is still anyone alive in South Chicago. But, the Media can't even locate a "supposed" White Supremist group to film doing ANYTHING.
"Black violence" is not more special or more unique than "white violence." Most crime is intra-racial, thus singling out "black crime" is a needless, although this racist trope has historic precedence. It arose in the post-Civil War South, where freed Blacks were called brutish, lazy, inferior, uncultured criminals. While some of those racist adjectives have fallen by the wayside, criminal and lazy are still in vogue today. This racist trope even figured prominently in "The Birth of a Nation", a film that glorified the Ku Klux Klan. Nonetheless, if someone is the victim of a crime, the perpetrator likely shares their race, so treating a black person victimizing another black person as worse than any other intraracial crime is a racist idea.
However, that is not relevant to this topic, white supremacist terrorism, which is not a interchangeable or synonymous with "white violence." The motivation of these terrorist attacks are based on white supremacy and/or white nationalism. "Black violence" (and "white violence" for that matter) are not motivated by race, so pointing out race, when it is not pertinent to the topic illustrates the racial underpinnings of the idea. Much like the violent rhetoric of some Islamic extremists, we too should be concerned about the violent rhetoric of white supremacists. Just the other day a man beat up a child because he wore a hat during the national anthem, should that be termed white violence? Or should it simply be termed violence? That point illustrates why mentioning Chicago and "black violence" are racist tropes, as the violence there is simply violence. The violence there is not a "black problem," it is a American problem and should be treated as such. When we turn violence among black people as being different from violence among white people, the racial bias is quite evident. This contrasts to white supremacist or religious terrorism as the belief system is motivated by the ideology about race, ethnicity or religion. Being Asian, Black, Hispanic, white, etc., is not the motivation of most intraracial crime, thus calling out the skin color in "black violence" or "white violence" makes no sense.
Perhaps instead of getting defensive, it is time to focus on combating white supremacy, as its overt expression has increased in the past few years. While some may hold the racist view that "black crime" is a reflection of black people, those of us concerned with white supremacist terrorism are concerned with the spread of white supremacy, which is not synonymous with white people (although those that follow that ideology are usually white).
There have been several terrorist attacks by white supremacists over the past few years, it's quite real.