Yes. We are in the midst of a relentless media campaign against a president who is effectively a New York Democrat who just so happened to run on the Republican ticket. Completely innocuous things he says are regularly cast as being racist.
But people aren't just disagreeing. They're accusing even the most minor difference of opinion as stemming from racism, and they're doing it nonstop.
You're still misunderstanding and/or misrepresenting my argument. My argument is that when you demonize the moderates, you create no social difference between the moderates and radicals.
Maybe you'll get more once you start accurately recapitulating my point of view.I continue to be disappointed that all I'm getting is assertion piled on top of assertion.
This I agree with. Demonizing the Far Left but not the moderates creates an incentive to be a moderate. That's why I speak well of Tulsi Gabbard.OK. Just like if one demonizes the moderate left, they create no social difference between the moderates and the radicals. I mean, I get that the hope here is to characterize moderates as far-left for some reason, but it isn't as if everyone who finds arguments against, say, affirmative action is a far-left radical. So you trying to lump them together is just going to radicalize people on the center-left, at least if we believe your argument. Which makes it weird you'd do so.
Dumbest quote from the article....
"The ideology is violence, and its adherents are by definition a threat."
Thoughts and ideas aren't violence. I wish people like the author would have the guts to come out and say what they mean instead of dancing around it. If they want to start policing speech and thoughts....they should just say so.
DeletedWhite supremacy is violence.
Dumbest post in this thread.
The author is not saying that the idea itself is a violent act. He's saying that the idea is one that promotes and causes violence.
I'm not sure why someone on this forum would take it upon themselves to either defend White Supremacists or to try and convince people that White Supremacy isn't a problem in USA.Are we talking about a handful of White nuts across this nation of 350 million who act out in their deranged mental state
Show me the incontrollable mobs of White Supremists on TV almost every week.
I apologize. I didn't read the article thoroughly enough, and I shouldn't have said what I did.Nope. He's definitely saying that the ideas themselves are violence. He repeats the claim throughout the article...and frequently complains about freedom of speech protecting people.
I apologize. I didn't read the article thoroughly enough, and I shouldn't have said what I did.
I hate to break it to you but I think it could and will get a whole lot worse. I know what you mean though.Apology accepted. I had to read it a couple of times myself to understand the point being made. The author compares white supremacists to MS-13 gang members and radical muslim terrorists...both of which don't get arrested for their beliefs. They get arrested for criminal activity. When the author says...
"People who devote their lives to purging “their” country of nonwhites are a threat; their presence at a community event makes others unsafe."
He's literally saying it should be a crime to hold those beliefs. He's saying that we shouldn't have to wait for such people to commit an actual crime. He's saying their mere existence should be criminalized.
That's about as authoritarian as it gets.
I hate to break it to you but I think it could and will get a whole lot worse. I know what you mean though.
Funny how the only people who constantly try to downplay the threat of white supremacy are the people who would never be targeted by white supremacists.
It would if they existed.Same goes for Black supremacy/supremacists doesn't it.
Maybe you'll get more once you start accurately recapitulating my point of view.
I'm not sure why someone on this forum would take it upon themselves to either defend White Supremacists or to try and convince people that White Supremacy isn't a problem in USA.
Apology accepted. I had to read it a couple of times myself to understand the point being made. The author compares white supremacists to MS-13 gang members and radical muslim terrorists...both of which don't get arrested for their beliefs. They get arrested for criminal activity. When the author says...
"People who devote their lives to purging “their” country of nonwhites are a threat; their presence at a community event makes others unsafe."
Ok. You found one.Search engines are your friend, oh look there's one
Ok. You found one.
How many people has he killed say, compared to the El Paso shooter?
Better yet, how many terror attacks have “black supremacists” been responsible for in the last 10 years?
You mean you can’t point to one major attack by a “black supremacist” in the last 10 years?You'd have to check all of the big city police blotters to come up with a good number.