Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
billychum said:But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; 8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles. Gal 2:7-8
To me this passage doesn't seem to be indicating that God had given two different gospels, but one gospel given to two different people in order to reach to different audiences.
Billy <><
eph3Nine said:Heres where you miss it. Peter went to a gentile, with much argument as he knew that God told them NOT to go unto the gentiles. God had to give Peter a special VISION to get him to go to Cornelius's house. However, Cornelius wasnt given a NEW gospel at all...he was saved by the same gospel Peter had ALWAYS preached. How do I know this. Because PAUL is the one given the NEW gospel, NOT Peter.
Yes, Cornelius was a gentile, but gentiles WERE saved under the KINGDOM gospel...NO MYSTERY HERE. The only thing different about Cornelius method of salvation is that he received the promise of the Spirit BEFORE he was water baptized. God was showing Peter that something NEW was indeed happening, but the same gospel was being preached to Cornelius. NO NEW MYSTERY information UNTIL PAUL.
eph3Nine said:Sorry...you are quite wrong on that one. If you study, you will come to that conclusion on your own. Good luck.![]()
WAB said:Paul gives us a thumbnail presentation of the gospel in 1Cor.15:1-4...and then goes on to give us more information that refutes your position. "...brethren, I declare unto you the gospel... By which you are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye believed in vain (or to no efffect). For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; And that [H]e was buried, and that [H]e rose again the third day according to the scriptures;"
Paul then goes on to say that "...[Jesus] was seen of Cephas (Peter), then of the twelve (Apostles); After that [H]e was seen of above five hundred brethren at once; ... After that [H]e was seen of James; then of all the apostles. And last of all [H]e was seen of me also, as of one born out of due time. For I am the least of the apostles, that am not meet to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God."
Then Paul goes on in verse 11 to inform us that "Therefore whether it were I (Paul) or they (the apostles), so we(both Paul and the apostles) preach, and so ye believed."
A straightforward reading of Paul's testimony here compels the reader to come to the conclusion that both the apostles and Paul preached the same gospel.
It is also informative to read the gospel that Peter preached. "...God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost and with power... whom they slew and hanged on a tree; Him God raised up the third day, and showed [H]im openly; Not to all the people, but unto witnesses chosen before of God, even to us, who did eat and drink with [H]im after
[H]e rose from the dead." (Acts 10:38-41)
Peter goes on to say that "...through [H]is name whosoever believeth in [H]im shall receive remission of sins." (vs.43)
This is the same gospel that Paul preached! And the responders to that everlasting gospel receive eternal life whether Jew or Gentile, and are mambers of the Church/Body of Christ.
billychum said:But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter; 8 (For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles. Gal 2:7-8
To me this passage doesn't seem to be indicating that God had given two different gospels, but one gospel given to two different people in order to reach to different audiences.
Billy <><
WAB said:Far from claiming that he was the only one to whom the mysteries had been revealed, Paul very clearly declares that they had been revealed the Lord's holy apostles and prophets, among whom were Peter & John, just to name two. (for one more statemant Paul made as to his behaviour prior to becoming a Christian, see Gal. 1:13).

AV1611 said:
eph3Nine said:The gospel of the CIRCUMCISION
eph3Nine said:The gospel of the UNCIRCUMCISION
eph3Nine said:There ...count em. TWO. If it was the same gospel, the words wouldnt BE there to distinguish BETWEEN THEM.
eph3Nine said:Im done.
eph3Nine said:There were actually MANY gospels in the scriptures...God gave His good news to mankind PROGRESSIVELY..NOT all at once.
billychum said:I surely agree with the uniqueness of Pauls ministry and message in comparison to Jesus and the apostles. But I wouldnt go so far as to say that it was a different gospel all together.
And if we were to be fair with one another, you might want to consider that yours is not the only way to interpret scripture.
Nothing wrong with agreeing to disagree.
Much love
Billy <><
billychum said:How do you do paltalk?
Billy <><