- Oct 20, 2017
- 890
- 103
- 93
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Presbyterian
- Marital Status
- Widowed
When you get some verifiable, scientific evidence, get back to me.
I have packed a big lunch, because you will not find any.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There there is no law of genetics that prevents taxa from being related by common ancestry.
No such book and no such definition exits.
Humans didn't stop being apes. Apes didn't stop being primates. Primates didn't stop being euarchontoglires. Euarchontoglires didn't stop being mammals. Etc.
Every species has different DNA. If they had the same DNA, then they would be the same species. And since humans are apes, our DNA is, axiomatically, ape DNA.
Whole genome duplication in stem vertebrates.
Two Rounds of Whole Genome Duplication in the Ancestral Vertebrate
α D -Globin Gene Originated via Duplication of an Embryonic α-Like Globin Gene in the Ancestor of Tetrapod Vertebrates | Molecular Biology and Evolution | Oxford Academic
Whole-Genome Duplications Spurred the Functional Diversification of the Globin Gene Superfamily in Vertebrates | Molecular Biology and Evolution | Oxford Academic
Gene duplication, genome duplication, and the functional diversification of vertebrate globins - ScienceDirect
ARHGAP11B
Human-specific gene ARHGAP11B promotes basal progenitor amplification and neocortex expansion
SRGAP2C
Human brain shaped by duplicate genes
....so you don't know how speciation causes new species?VERY!
He just provided a face full of evidence in that very post - I don't accept you're even close to actually being that obtuse.When you get some verifiable, scientific evidence, get back to me.
I have packed a big lunch, because you will not find any.
Change in allele representations in populations over time due to mutations. Not due merely to time however.
That is a false. Most mutations are to non-coding DNA and have zero effect on fitness. A higher percentage cause genetic diseases rather than cause benefits, but the latter do happen. As those mutations build up over time, they cause speciation to happen.
Human mutation rate revealed : Nature News
Every time human DNA is passed from one generation to the next it accumulates 100–200 new mutations, according to a DNA-sequencing analysis of the Y chromosome.
This simply isn't true. Creationists don't define "kind". In one breath they claim it means interfertile populations. In the next it means anything from a genus to a domain. If "they have" defined it, then perhaps you could provide us with this supposed definition.
cont.
Oh, I suspect I understand the real meaning of Christmas better than you. I had an awesome couple of days full of pagan festivities and commercial over-indulgences. Living in Asia allows one to truly accept the circus show for what it really is. Muslims in santa hats, Christmas greetings from Hindus and Taoist temples beautifully decorated. It's a truly awesome commercial festival embraced by all
We thought so.
He just provided a face full of evidence in that very post - I don't accept you're even close to actually being that obtuse.
Itis amusing that you post some quotes about truth, but don't present something TOE ha proved to be true.
Typical evo rhetoric. You would if you could but you can't.
We all just watched you completely bypass an entire post dripping with the scientific research, repeatedly confirming Evolution as if it didn't exist! Short of coming to you and beating you over the head with it, I doubt you'll ever acknowledge it.The usual evo talking points are not evidence.
Do you really not understand that real evidence provides the how IT CAN HAPPEN?
Yep. You may want to sit down as I break the news to you..... 9/11 is US only. I know you guys think the world revolves around you but it doesn't. Much of the rest of the world, for instance, writes the date 11/9 and uses other numbers for contacting emergency services. And that doesn't make us all Al-Qaeda supporters
I assumed you were talking about the event known as 9/11. I wanted to point out that the name for a US only event uses a predominantly US date format which also matches a predominantly US emergency services number. While we are aware of the event, most of the rest of the world does not celebrate or commemorate it.
Hmmm, there was six links full of verifiable scientific evidence in post #339.When you get some verifiable, scientific evidence, get back to me.
I have packed a big lunch, because you will not find any.
Whole genome duplication in stem vertebrates.
Two Rounds of Whole Genome Duplication in the Ancestral Vertebrate
α D -Globin Gene Originated via Duplication of an Embryonic α-Like Globin Gene in the Ancestor of Tetrapod Vertebrates | Molecular Biology and Evolution | Oxford Academic
Whole-Genome Duplications Spurred the Functional Diversification of the Globin Gene Superfamily in Vertebrates | Molecular Biology and Evolution | Oxford Academic
Gene duplication, genome duplication, and the functional diversification of vertebrate globins - ScienceDirect
ARHGAP11B
Human-specific gene ARHGAP11B promotes basal progenitor amplification and neocortex expansion
SRGAP2C
Human brain shaped by duplicate genes
How does a change in an allele change a species?
Do you really not understand that mutation only alter a character in the gene pool of the parents?
That can't change a species in a gazillion years.
Even if that was true, which is isn't, it would not result in a change of species.
Mutations are not a mechanism for a change of species. You can't provide one example of it ever happening.
"After them kind" defines kind.
That is why we see it in plants, beasts, birds, fish, cattle and humans.
Humans are apes and all apes (including humans) are related by common ancestry:FYI apes are beasts and people are humans.
A change in allele representation in a population. When different gene variants (that's what alleles are) change as a percentage of the population, there is a commensurate change to the species.
I do not "understand" that because it simply isn't true. I have provided several examples and an article showing that offspring are born with mutations that neither parent possesses due to the imperfect replication of DNA.
The evidence I have presented says otherwise.
Hand waving does not make the evidence go away.
Hand waving does not make opinions evidence.
How Many Genetic Mutations Do I Have?
When parents pass their genes down to their children, an average of 60 errors are introduced to the genetic code in the process, according to a new study. Any of those five dozen mutations could be the source of major differences in a person's appearance or behavior as compared to his or her parents and altogether, the mistakes are the driving force of evolution.
Not true
I posted two in #339.
ARHGAP11B
Human-specific gene ARHGAP11B promotes basal progenitor amplification and neocortex expansion
SRGAP2C
http://www.nature.com/news/human-brain-shaped-by-duplicate-genes-1.10584
Anther false opinion.
hat's not a definition. That's not even a tautology.You are half right. Its not a tautology bit it is a definition.
>>And yet all of them are related by common ancestry as Eukaryotes.<<
Again only an OPINION, with no supporting evience
Humans are apes and all apes (including humans) are related by common ancestry:
with monkeys and lemurs as primates
with rodents and rabbits as euarchontoglires
with cattle as eutherians
with birds as amniotes
with fish as vertebraes
with plants as eukaryotesA change in allele representation in a population. When different gene variants (that's what alleles are) change as a percentage of the population, there is a commensurate change to the species.
I do not "understand" that because it simply isn't true. I have provided several examples and an article showing that offspring are born with mutations that neither parent possesses due to the imperfect replication of DNA.
The evidence I have presented says otherwise.
Hand waving does not make the evidence go away.
How Many Genetic Mutations Do I Have?
When parents pass their genes down to their children, an average of 60 errors are introduced to the genetic code in the process, according to a new study. Any of those five dozen mutations could be the source of major differences in a person's appearance or behavior as compared to his or her parents and altogether, the mistakes are the driving force of evolution.
I posted two in #339.
ARHGAP11B
Human-specific gene ARHGAP11B promotes basal progenitor amplification and neocortex expansion
SRGAP2C
http://www.nature.com/news/human-brain-shaped-by-duplicate-genes-1.10584
That's not a definition. That's not even a tautology.
And yet all of them are related by common ancestry as Eukaryotes.
Humans are apes and all apes (including humans) are related by common ancestry:
with monkeys and lemurs as primates
with rodents and rabbits as euarchontoglires
with cattle as eutherians
with birds as amniotes
with fish as vertebraes
with plants as eukaryotes
A change in allele representation in a population. When different gene variants (that's what alleles are) change as a percentage of the population, there is a commensurate change to the species.
I do not "understand" that because it simply isn't true. I have provided several examples and an article showing that offspring are born with mutations that neither parent possesses due to the imperfect replication of DNA.
That's not a definition. That's not even a tautology.
And yet all of them are related by common ancestry as Eukaryotes.
H
Right but the variants only change characteristic, eye color, hair color,etc, they do not change the species.
That only shows you do not understand mutations or science. When a mutation causes a kid to become an albino, it remains the exact same species a its parents and you cant provide an example that is not rue.
That shows you think opinions are evidence. Think again.
No you didn't.
<Humans are apes and all apes (including humans) are related by common ancestry:
with monkeys and lemurs as primates
with rodents and rabbits as euarchontoglires
with cattle as eutherians
with fish as vertebraes
with plants as eukaryotes
A bit convenient that, don’t you think?Have you never hear of the principle of reproductive similarity? This important tenet of the theory of evolution states that no offspring will ever differ by more than a small amount from its parent(s).
After how many tries?ToE makes a prediction that just happens to matches reality.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?