Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Again, you ignore the post and promote your own version of events.
I went to Catholic school. I was not taught anything about young earth creationism.
Yet you insist on providing only your version of the story here. Why is that?
The Biology textbook does not mention God.
The theory of evolution does not mention God.
It does say that living things appeared through blind, unguided chance.
And that it is the sufficient explanation. Right?
Second, Darwin's great discovery was that evolution isn't by chance. It if was just random variation, nothing would work. It's important for you to understand this, if you want to understand anything about it... Natural selection is the antithesis of chance.
Seems like non-sequitur.
You seem to be saying, "Everything works, and continues to work, therefore it could not have been by chance."
Admittedly you could argue that random chance is only needed for abiogenesis
and thus any future evolution is just the product of adaptable DNA.
This still leaves the student, who is sitting in a biology class, with the indoctrination that random chance was the only root cause needed.
Please don't compare this issue to plumbers. Plumbers are intelligent designers
hich makes it consistent with creationism.
That is in no way a threat to the faith of the Christian.
Gravity remains unexplained.
Thanks for confirming my reading of you. All these statements amount to the same thing. Perhaps you've become so one-sided, so tunnel-visioned in your thinking that you can no longer be objective? All these statements are saying, ""Everything works, and continues to work, therefore it could not have been by chance."Second, Darwin's great discovery was that evolution isn't by chance. It if was just random variation, nothing would work. It's important for you to understand this, if you want to understand anything about it... Natural selection is the antithesis of chance...In fact, as Karl Popper noted, we do have examples of random evolutionary change, and those cases don't result in increased fitness. Only those changes that have a selective value can be acted on by natural selection. That's what the Hardy-Weinberg equation determines...It appears that the physical laws of this universe are such that life is likely to appear whenever specific conditions exist. If you want to call that "random chance", i'd have to disagree.....You still don't get it. Random variation, by itself, can't do much of anything. But random variation plus natural selection, does increase fitness, which is how new traits and taxa evolve.
Looks like deflection. I don't think that meets the thrust of the objection.Here you've confused plumbers and plumbing (and scientists and science). Try to focus here; the key is that both science and plumbing are methodlogically naturalistic. Which is why plumbing manuals don't talk about God.
Is it your belief and/or the belief of the Catholic Church that all Homo sapiens originated from Adam and Eve and that their descendants shared their genetic material with other hominins?Evolutionary theory doesn't predict polygenism. It's quite possible for a population to be the result of just 2 individuals. You may have noted here that one of the most outspoken advocates of polygenism (Agassiz) strongly opposed Darwin's theory.
Is it your belief and/or the belief of the Catholic Church that all Homo sapiens originated from Adam and Eve and that their descendants shared their genetic material with other hominins?
Thanks for confirming my reading of you.
All these statements are saying, ""Everything works, and continues to work, therefore it could not have been by chance."
You're trying to say that natural selection and random chance are mutually exclusive concepts.
If you don't, by random chance, get selectively ADVANTAGEOUS combinations, natural selection won't even buy you a cup of coffee.
As I said, random chance is somewhat avoided if the DNA is setup for high adaptability.
But it's not stressed in most biology classes that abiogenesis of such highly adaptable DNA is unlikely without God.
Looks like deflection.
Based on comments here, I reject Biology textbook, so-called evolution.
I accept Intelligent Design as the correct answer.
And God is the designer.
I reject the following statement as not being true.
"Even if scientists are designers, nature is not."
Another false statement.
The overwhelming evidence for design exists.
'The Church “proclaims that by the light of reason the human intellect can readily and clearly discern purpose and design in the natural world, including the world of living things.”
A cheap diversion.
Panentheism is not contrary to the teaching of the Church:Suggesting that nature "designs" is a doctrine of panentheism:
Panentheism holds that God is the "supreme effect" of the universe. God is everything in the universe, but God also is greater than the universe. Events and changes in the universe affect and change God. As the universe grows and learns, God also increases in knowledge and being.
What is panentheism? | GotQuestions.org
This is contrary to the teaching of the Church. Nature is merely a created tool of God; it has no consciousness or intent any more than a hammer has consciousness or intent.
Panentheism is not contrary to the teaching of the Church:
I think this is called Theistic Finitism. It is not necessarily a feature of Panentheism, otherwise EO, OO, and many RC would not have accepted Panentheism as the articles quoted above show:I didn't think so, until I found that description of panentheism:
"As the universe grows and learns, God also increases in knowledge and being."
Yes, this is true.Christians hold that God is perfect and eternal. He does not change. Or at least that's what I've gotten from my teachers in the Church.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?