heb.2.16For, not surely of messengers, is he laying hold, but, of Abraham's seed, he is laying hold.And so the fault of your simple understanding, comparing Jesus existence to yours.
2:17 Whence he was obliged, in every way, unto the brethren, to be made like, that he might become a merciful and faithful high-priest, in the things pertaining unto God,—for the making of propitiation for the sins of the people.
2:18 For, in that, he, suffered when tested, he is able, unto them who are being tested, to give succour.
No you have just redefined the words beget and conceive. You do not know what the words mean.AnticipateHisComing said:When a man and a woman conceive, they create a body and a soul. When the Holy Spirit conceived in Mary, it was the creation of flesh, not a soul. The soul of Jesus came down from heaven to the flesh of Jesus. This is what Hebrews means when it says Jesus was made lower for a little while.
Is there a word for creating a body, I think it conceive. Is there a word for creating a soul, I think it beget. If this is not accurate, than I know of no word for the creation of a body without the creation of a soul.
I take God at his word when he said that he, God, the Holy Spirit, beget Jesus in mary. And I take God at his word when God said Mary conceived Jesus. I believe God knows what those words mean. You do not.
Jesus has a mother, and a Father. God is the Father of Jesus, and Mary is the mother of Jesus, And Jesus has a genealogy, it's listed in Matthew.AnticipateHisComing said:Is it possible for flesh to be created without a soul? Certainly, Jesus is an example of it. I have also postulated before, that the Nephilim did not have souls?
There are many scripture verses that speak to the Son of God existing before being born. John used the name Logos/Word for him at the time of creation. The Old Testament uses the Angel of the Lord. Sometimes it was just Lord. Regardless, Jesus existence did not start with his conception.
This thread was started with a quote of Hebrews 5:4-6. Everyone is fixated on verse 5 which is the OP question; "Today have I begotten thee". Verse 6 is ignored which teaches that this "calling" as stated in verse 4 is in the same order as Melchizedek . Read Heb 7 to learn that this means he is eternal and not of earthly ancestory.
Heb 7:2 First, the name Melchizedek means “king of righteousness”; then also, “king of Salem” means “king of peace.” 3 Without father or mother, without genealogy, without beginning of days or end of life, resembling the Son of God, he remains a priest forever.
AnticpateHisComing said:.
Later Paul elaborates saying Jesus had a dual ancestory.
Heb 7:13 He of whom these things are said belonged to a different tribe, and no one from that tribe has ever served at the altar. 14 For it is clear that our Lord descended from Judah, and in regard to that tribe Moses said nothing about priests. 15 And what we have said is even more clear if another priest like Melchizedek appears[Jesus], 16 one who has become a priest not on the basis of a regulation as to his ancestry but on the basis of the power of an indestructible life. 17 For it is declared:Further Heb 9 says Jesus was the perfect sacrifice[God] from the perfect temple[heaven].
“You are a priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek.”
Heb 9:11 But when Christ came as high priest of the good things that are now already here, he went through the greater and more perfect tabernacle that is not made with human hands, that is to say, is not a part of this creation.
Jesus is the new man, the new creation of God, the last Adam. so Jesus is not of this human creation, the first adam.
AnticpateHisComing said:14 How much more, then, will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself unblemished to God, cleanse our consciences from acts that lead to death,[c] so that we may serve the living God!
AnticpateHisComing said:I am amazed at how often people in CF post insults thinking that makes their argument more intelligent. I find it a desperate act that more often proves ignorant the statements of the one who said it and not to whom it is said.
What insult. I stated words to the effect that I was surprised that so many people didn't know what beget and conceive meant. and you have proven that you do not know what the words mean. I was merely stating a fact. And it also appears that you are unable to comprehend what the word beget and conceive means.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FertilisationHumans[edit]
Fertilization in humans. The sperm and ovum unite through fertilization, creating a zygote that (over the course of 8-9 days) will implant in the uterine wall, where it will reside over the course of 9 months.
Main article: Human fertilization
The term conception commonly refers to fertilisation, which is the successful fusion of gametes to form a new organism
More words related to beget
fertilize
verb. make ready to bear, produce
beget
breed
http://www.thesaurus.com/browse/beget/2
It's really surprising to me that you don't know what conceive and beget means. I had assumed everyone above the age of puberty knew what I quoted above. Your definition of beget and conceive does not in any way mean fertilize, thus you hve invented your own special definition of beget and conceive. As I said I believe God means what he says.. and when God says beget he means beget not what you change the word to.
Last edited:
Upvote
0