AphroditeGoneAwry
Well-Known Member
- Dec 2, 2012
- 517
- 173
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
1. False. It's one's interpretation which is at fault. Those who do NOT believe Genesis chapter one CANNOT understand the rest of the Bible.
Agreed.
2. False. The sons of God (prehistoric people) evolved from the common ancestor of Apes but Humans were made long before ANY other living creature. Gen 2:4-7
Interesting! I like it.
But I would not call early man sons of God. Sons of God is a term reserved for those from God's chosen people following the line of Adam, Seth, Noah, Shem, and on down the line to Jesus. All other men would be referred to as simply 'men', as illustrated in Genesis 6:1. There is no description of ape men at all in the Bible. I believe God made many adams (men) but only one special chosen Adam to inhabit the Garden of Eden.
ADM is plural. That is Hebrew for Adam. It means ruddy. There is every indication in the original language to believe there were many men made, but only ONE Adam worthy of being in God's garden.
The sons of God (line of Seth/Shem) bred with the daughters of men (Cain's line) and God became displeased. That is when God destroyed all the line of Cain effectually and began again with only Noah and his descendants.
I just noticed something in my review which is exciting. Genesis 6:4 :
The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God (those from the line of Seth) came in to the daughters of men (those from the line of Cain), and they bore children to them. Those were the mighty men who were of old, men of renown.
RENOWN is what the name Shem means. Shem is the chosen son of Noah, which Japheth and Ham are to serve. From Shem's line comes Jesus. Shem means 'the name'. It also is used to mean 'there'. The usage of the word 'old' supports your theory that God's human came before all other men. But to finish the story, we see that even with half of the genes of these people being God's chosen ones, it was not enough to prevent them from becoming evil through and through. (this is the topic for another thread).
However, the fossil record appears to support an older ape like man vs a modern human like man. How do you reconcile this?
3. False. Man was made with an intelligence like God's. Gen 3:22 Animals are innocent because they are unable to know good and evil. Science has FALSELY classified Humans as innocent animals.
4. False. What is apparent is that some people have NO idea what Genesis is saying. They see 2 stories of the Creation when there is but One. The problem is with their interpretation which does NOT agree with Scripture.
5. God concealed His Truth from people who lived BEFORE the last days. The men named could NOT understand what was written so they tried to explain. Some people STILL believe their ideas because they don't believe the Bible in the first place. Amen?
Agreed.
Thanks for giving me a boost in my spiritual understanding!
Last edited:
Upvote
0