MiniEmu
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Biblical integrity is an interesting one, and I must admit to being the kind who would view a group able to embrace the differences in interpretation and allow for people who come to their decisions through study and contemplation to do as they believe to be right in the eyes of God.
Have you ever met a Christian where the tradition of their church genuinely obscured the core of their faith? These nuts and bolts of faith, are they things people hold in agreement? What traditions, what inaccuracies and improper doctrines, so muddy the waters that the core of our faith is obscured beyond redemption? I am not pointing a stick at you and requiring answers, but they are thoughts which cross my mind. Seemingly with greater frequency now I'm exposed to a greater diversity of believers.
I am no so fussed about disagreements in understanding, in thinking that it would be more accurate to view things one way or to do away with certain elements. That is natural. My work involves dealing with clergy, and the diversity they display in how they interpret His word (despite the sort of, kind of standardised view the church supposedly holds) is fascinating. People develop as they develop, and when these people are priests people find themselves guided by them; generations are influenced, and if they disagree they find a new place to settle (faith wise).
I think it pleasant enough to be involved in lively discussions were the disagreement runs deep but both respect that this is born out of interpretative differences. It encourages growth, and dare I say it such interactions can strengthen our beliefs by encouraging us to think about them outside the comfort zone of scripture.
Yet I do become fussed when the whole intent seems not to discuss the differences, but to point out that the truth is only true if it is the truth they agree with. There are lots of speakers who say such things, not many have provided the sort of discussion which leads me down their rationalisation for stating their view is sound, while those who disagree are being led in a merry dance by Beelzebub. Which is entirely a fault of my personality, which makes bringing it up here ridiculous.
Still, this is the thread for things that are on your mind. Short of writing them down in my diary they'd only go down further ridiculous rabbit holes until I manage to talk things through with the priest.
Oh, and thank you for your patient and thoughtful replies. I did not expect anyone to touch upon my rambling nonsense, so I am sure after a day at work I shall review these posts with a great sense of "oh no".
Have you ever met a Christian where the tradition of their church genuinely obscured the core of their faith? These nuts and bolts of faith, are they things people hold in agreement? What traditions, what inaccuracies and improper doctrines, so muddy the waters that the core of our faith is obscured beyond redemption? I am not pointing a stick at you and requiring answers, but they are thoughts which cross my mind. Seemingly with greater frequency now I'm exposed to a greater diversity of believers.
I am no so fussed about disagreements in understanding, in thinking that it would be more accurate to view things one way or to do away with certain elements. That is natural. My work involves dealing with clergy, and the diversity they display in how they interpret His word (despite the sort of, kind of standardised view the church supposedly holds) is fascinating. People develop as they develop, and when these people are priests people find themselves guided by them; generations are influenced, and if they disagree they find a new place to settle (faith wise).
I think it pleasant enough to be involved in lively discussions were the disagreement runs deep but both respect that this is born out of interpretative differences. It encourages growth, and dare I say it such interactions can strengthen our beliefs by encouraging us to think about them outside the comfort zone of scripture.
Yet I do become fussed when the whole intent seems not to discuss the differences, but to point out that the truth is only true if it is the truth they agree with. There are lots of speakers who say such things, not many have provided the sort of discussion which leads me down their rationalisation for stating their view is sound, while those who disagree are being led in a merry dance by Beelzebub. Which is entirely a fault of my personality, which makes bringing it up here ridiculous.
Still, this is the thread for things that are on your mind. Short of writing them down in my diary they'd only go down further ridiculous rabbit holes until I manage to talk things through with the priest.
Oh, and thank you for your patient and thoughtful replies. I did not expect anyone to touch upon my rambling nonsense, so I am sure after a day at work I shall review these posts with a great sense of "oh no".
Upvote
0