Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And a lot of men are going MGTOW..
No surprise really..
Women are getting more and more open about being picky, yet they are also getting fatter and fatter.
166 pounds is obscene.
I weigh, 160 pounds, and I am quite content, about it. As you can see, in my photo, from when I was the same weight, as now, I'm not "obscene", no, not at all. I am very fit. I remember you posting, about your weight, last summer. You wrote, then, that you were 165 pounds, at 5'7, I think? Do you think, that you are obscene? BMI, it's imperfect, but it's a rudimentary measure. Your BMI, it's about 26, overweight. Mine is 22.
I'm not just 'another poster' in here. I'm Saucy, so show some respect kid.I mean just look at how post tenebras lux is defending women and another poster in this thread said we were being mean. Why is it when women have standards its not a problem but when men do its them being shallow superfical monsters? And lets be honest here men ask for much less from women than women ask from men. Women have a long list of things they need before giving a man even a chance. Men on the other hand want just someone who they can look at and someone they can get along with.
What is wrong with a man being short? Lol..What is wrong with 5-4 166?
What about those height threads? Where women here had no problem listing their height requirement?Sorry I didn't get a chance to reply earlier, but yes, I think you guys are being very mean.
I understand you're speaking from a position of hurt. You've been hurt by women, but the best thing isn't to try and spread that hurt around. You've inadvertently hurt women here with your words who have done nothing wrong to you. 166 pounds is not "obscene". If that's too much woman for your taste, that's fine, but guys aren't just sharing your preferences. You're making fun of women and making references to climbing mountains and all of that.
I'm not trying to start any trouble or get into a debate. Just asking that you be more understanding and not fight hurt with hurt.
Sorry I didn't get a chance to reply earlier, but yes, I think you guys are being very mean.
I understand you're speaking from a position of hurt. You've been hurt by women, but the best thing isn't to try and spread that hurt around. You've inadvertently hurt women here with your words who have done nothing wrong to you. 166 pounds is not "obscene". If that's too much woman for your taste, that's fine, but guys aren't just sharing your preferences. You're making fun of women and making references to climbing mountains and all of that.
I'm not trying to start any trouble or get into a debate. Just asking that you be more understanding and not fight hurt with hurt.
Your BMI, it's about 26, overweight. Mine is 22.
What is wrong with 5-4 166?
It was more of a joke about even heavy women being too good for short guys than anything.I was just messing around. I'm sorry.
Sometimes I make a better Newgrounder than a CFer.
Saying big women are like mountains and you can become a mountaineer or saying 166 is obscene is beyond just sharing your likes. It's making fun of them and not welcome here.
Saying you're not attracted to larger women or short guys is one thing. Saying big women are like mountains and you can become a mountaineer or saying 166 is obscene is beyond just sharing your likes. It's making fun of them and not welcome here.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?