Well, I have a lot of libertarian leanings, and I occasionally smoke, so I'm sympathetic to you.
However, there can be a reasonable, non-communal argument for such a ban. All of these businesses require workers who may be exposed to secondhand smoke. It's all well and good to say that they can choose to work at a smoke free business, but let's face it--some people will be forced to work in smoky environments. Also, _more_ non-smoking customers will be exposed to smoke without the ban. Also, smoking seems more socially acceptable without the ban.
Now, when someone without decent insurance gets sick, the taxpayer foots the bill. So it's a rather simple matter to argue that taxpayer interest alone dictates that the ban should be enacted, since it is absurd for taxpayers to allow public consumption of a deadly poison when, in the end, it costs the taxpayers a great deal of money.
I still oppose the ban, but I guess I'm less cynical than you about the arguments in its favor. It certainly is contrary to the principles of free enterprise, but so are thousands and thousands of other laws. That alone can't win the argument.
However, there can be a reasonable, non-communal argument for such a ban. All of these businesses require workers who may be exposed to secondhand smoke. It's all well and good to say that they can choose to work at a smoke free business, but let's face it--some people will be forced to work in smoky environments. Also, _more_ non-smoking customers will be exposed to smoke without the ban. Also, smoking seems more socially acceptable without the ban.
Now, when someone without decent insurance gets sick, the taxpayer foots the bill. So it's a rather simple matter to argue that taxpayer interest alone dictates that the ban should be enacted, since it is absurd for taxpayers to allow public consumption of a deadly poison when, in the end, it costs the taxpayers a great deal of money.
I still oppose the ban, but I guess I'm less cynical than you about the arguments in its favor. It certainly is contrary to the principles of free enterprise, but so are thousands and thousands of other laws. That alone can't win the argument.
Upvote
0