Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That makes half the worlds population would probably agree that the writings of at least part of the Bible have greatly influenced their lives. You asked me about the number....and?
That makes half the worlds population would probably agree that the writings of at least part of the Bible have greatly influenced their lives.
You see my point then...he knows what will happen, does he not? Certaintly he must've known the future would hold much better methods of recording and transmitting information?
Yet he didn't choose today transmit his message today...he picked a time of rampant mythology, superstition, and prophecy. He picked a time when men still followed the authority of other men because they were believed to be divine.
Do Muslims believe in the Bible? - Talk to IslamWhich has no impact on it being words from a deity.
Additionally it's a bit of a stretch to include Muslims in the Bible believing category as they have their own scriptures.
You see my point then...he knows what will happen, does he not? Certaintly he must've known the future would hold much better methods of recording and transmitting information?
Yet he didn't choose today transmit his message today...he picked a time of rampant mythology, superstition, and prophecy. He picked a time when men still followed the authority of other men because they were believed to be divine. He could hardly have chosen a worse time to deliver his message.
What's so difficult about that? God only speaks ancient Hebrew? Or Greek?
I like poetry and fiction...I agree completely that these methods can relate ideas an expressions...often beautifully. If god's goal was to be beautiful and artistic in his expression...then perhaps you've got yourself a good point.
What those mediums are not, however, is clear and direct. We aren't simply talking about little stories that give advice about your life...let's be clear about what's at stake if you "miss" god's message in christianity...shall we? We're talking about the damnation of your eternal soul. It seems like with that at stake....clarity and directness should be the top priority....far more important than pretty words and middling stories. So if you think god chose to sound beautiful and artistic over clear and direct...you can only conclude that he doesn't really care that a lot of people aren't going to correctly interpret his message...which doesn't speak well of his motivations (as I said in my last post)
Let me put it this way...
Suppose a truck had overturned on a road you were driving along and a giant poisonous gas cloud lay ahead of you. You see me stopped alongside the road and you ask me why I stopped there...
Do you want me to give you the information about the giant poisonous gas cloud in...
1. Poetry and parables. Sure, you may not realize that I'm talking about a giant gas cloud in your path that will certainly kill you should you continue driving....but boy it's gonna sound pretty!
2. Direct and clear language. Something like "Hey, stupid! Turn around and go back the way you came! There's a giant poisonous gas cloud in the road ahead that's gonna kill you if you keep driving that way!"
My guess is that even though it doesn't come off as pretty...you'd probably rather I choose to communicate this extremely important message using method #2. If I were to use method #1 I could be accurately described as a jerk, sadist, or at least apathetic towards the imminent death of many people.
Well. It could be argued that the ethical norms conveyed in Scripture are responsible for getting the world to a civilized and unified enough place to be able to invent stuff like TVs, the internet, and iPads. So perhaps the Bible is a victim of its own success.
The first difficulty that I see is that not all people in history are alive at the same time.
I do believe that what God wants to convey is much more than propositional truth and requires story and poetry.
I think that God is very direct in Scripture when he needs to be and I think he's very artistic and subtle in other places.
Is poetry or narrative unclear? Is propositional truth more clear than truths conveyed through story or poetry? I think these are highly debatable questions. I think that propositional truth without the help of narrative and poetic illustration is actually very confusing and too abstract to be of much use.
Well this is an interesting point and actually one that Jesus directly addressed. If you'll remember, his disciples once asked him why he taught in parables rather than stating truth directly and plainly. Jesus' response was this:
Matthew 13:13 - This is why I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand.
Apparently the people that Jesus was dealing with didn't understand the clear language. They just weren't hearing what God was plainly saying. I think this is probably because they did not want to hear what God was plainly saying. To go along with your analogy (use of a parable to convey a clear truth that I don't seem to be hearing), it's like the man on the road is dead-set on proceeding forth and doesn't want to hear that there's a cloud of poisonous gas. This makes the situation more complicated. So Jesus taught with stories and parables in order to sneak truths into peoples' psyches that they may have normally had their defenses set up against.
You could make that argument...but I could just as easily argue that the regressive nature of the teachings of the bible are responsible for the "dark ages" and stifled the forward progress of mankind for centuries...resulting in death, famine, and persecution on a previously unknown scale.
Sure, but even if it only happened once...it would be difficult for historians to explain all of mankind hearing the exact same message at the exact same time...without the intervention of some otherworldly deity.
@Ana the Ist It is somewhat ironic that you used a parable to make your point more clear, is it not?
This isn't the fault of the Bible in my mind so much as the sinful tendencies of human beings. Indeed, this confirms a theme within the Bible, that the good things of God can be misused.
Look up the Axial Age. A similar message happening all at once... "whatever is hurtful to you, do not do to others".
I could go on...but I'm hoping that you see the problem. Those stories really don't resonate today
and that makes them rather ineffective for keeping people from hell.
You could make that argument...but I could just as easily argue that the regressive nature of the teachings of the bible are responsible for the "dark ages" and stifled the forward progress of mankind for centuries...resulting in death, famine, and persecution on a previously unknown scale.
Sure, but even if it only happened once...it would be difficult for historians to explain all of mankind hearing the exact same message at the exact same time...without the intervention of some otherworldly deity.
Fair enough...give me one example of something in the bible which couldn't be explained better with clear and direct language. I'm interested in what you think needs conveying.
You're entitled to your opinion...however I think the existence of such diverse denominations and wildly different interpretations of the bible between and within those denominations proves rather definitively that it isn't clear at all.
Frankly, it sounds like a poor excuse for why he only had a handful of followers. What religion hasn't used the old "everyone else just doesn't get it" excuse?
What @FireDragon76 said.
I'm sure they'd find a naturalistic explanation ;-)
You're asking for me to describe what poetry adds to a propositional truth statement. This is difficult to discuss propositionally. Better to look at an example:
Amos 3:8 -
The lion has roared; who will not fear?
The Lord God has spoken; who can but prophesy?
This is a type of Hebrew poetic structure called parallelism. There's two lines that say the same thing twice, although in two different ways. One is a poetic image and one is more of a propositional statement. So what does the first line add? Why not just stick with the proposition?
As an insider I don't really have much of a problem with diversity within Christianity. I don't think that the Bible is crystal clear on everything. It is clear on enough, however.
We all agree on the Apostles' Creed and that's enough for me. Diversity is a good thing. Where the Bible is unclear there's room for disagreement.
Yeah. That whole Jesus group never really got off the ground, did it?
I don't know what those two lines are trying to say...and that's really the problem. Why in the world would god use "Hebrew poetic structure" for a message meant for all of mankind? Pretty stupid, don't you think?
If I read that...I would think "I don't fear when lions roar...cuz there aren't any lions around me." So the second line adds nothing to the first.
Not until a Roman emperor annihilated religious freedom around 300A.D. and forced his reluctant population into christianity with violence and began an age where learning was stifled and many advances were lost...no...it was a rather small cult before then.
Understanding what Hebrew parallelism is isn't necessary for understanding the power of the metaphor.
I suppose the Bible wasn't written for you, then.
But luckily modern folks like you have Youtube and Metropolitan zoos at their disposal. It wouldn't take much for you to figure this one out. And I suppose you're playing dumb, anyway.
Didn't Rome get sacked?
I don't understand the metaphor though...what is it saying?
It wasn't written for anyone alive right now! That's my point! Even if you think that parables are great for conveying messages at the time they're written...they stink at conveying messages to all of humanity across all time! Seriously, the story about going up into a mountainside cave and having drunken sex with one's daughters...what am I supposed to get from that? What's the message there? And I'm talking specifically about the part where he has sex with his daughters...
What's the message behind those two lines?
Multiple times, for several reasons, but the only thing that really stopped the rest of Europe from enjoying things like modern agriculture, running water, waste disposal, and many many other advances that the Romans enjoyed was an almost slavish belief that all knowledge outside of the bible was bad or useless....and only the bible contained real knowledge. With that regressive belief...the whole of the continent slipped rather quickly into the dark ages.
Well the story of Lot and his daughters is meant to be historical, not parabolic. It explains where the troublesome Moabites and Ammonites came from - an incestual relationship.
I'd also point out that a Christian civilization, the Byzantines, enjoyed a lot of those amenities that Ana is saying that supposedly the Bible hindered. There was nothing unsophisticated about their culture.
Maybe the Bible helped hold together a crumbling civilization in the west? Considering that the Francs were little more than illiterate barbarians when they were Christianized, it's not hard to conclude this.
If there were no Christianity, then the Franks and Goths would have overrun Rome and butchered each other and left a tattered landscape devoid of any of that glorious learning people appreciate so much.
Christianity created a class of celibate, bored men with nothing better to do than to write stuff down, preserve it, just because they believed it had value.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?