You are projecting.
Is this an admission that you will claim that the flood did it no matter what the evidence is?
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
What Would Falsify the Flood?
- Thread starter Loudmouth
- Start date
- Status
You are projecting.
Is this an admission that you will claim that the flood did it no matter what the evidence is?
EternalDragon
Counselor
Yes, I can.
Flagellum, cilium, blood clotting, and the many other complex biological machinery inside living organisms.
Well then. Evolution theory......BUSTED!. (To mimic your debating tactics).
Upvote
0
How do any of these falsify the theory of evolution?
Also, what features must a geologic feature have in order to falsify a recent global flood? You still have not named a single feature.
Upvote
0
EternalDragon
Counselor
Well lasthero, creationism came in when we started to talk about fossils and the earth and the flood.
ID theory looks inside organisms to detect if there are design features. I don't think it has anything to do with the flood or fossils although they do mention things like that on other sections of evolutionnews.org.
Upvote
0
EternalDragon
Counselor
None of those can arise in a step wise fashion by natural selection.
Upvote
0
S
Solomio
Guest
And you know this how? did your pastor tell you? he knows about as much as you do which is nothing,
if you want to know about carpentry ask a carpenter not an electrician.
Upvote
0
Subduction Zone
Regular Member
And all of those claims have been refuted.
The blood clotting claim was a huge fiasco for Behe in the Dover trial.
You can deny it all you want and we can put the actual science that says you are wrong again and again.
No scientist takes the claim of Behe seriously today. He is a clown that has a job only because he was tenured before he went crazy.
Upvote
0
Subduction Zone
Regular Member
And yet we have shown that they can and that they do.
Denying demonstrated facts is breaking the Ninth Commandment.
Upvote
0
Subduction Zone
Regular Member
And creationists cannot explain the fossil record.
How many times do you need to be shown this?
Upvote
0
I'd really like an answer, Eddy - why aren't seagoing reptiles found in the same strata as seagoing mammals? Why do they completely vanish long before whales on the fossil record?
Upvote
0
EternalDragon
Counselor
Who told you they could? Your scientist (pastor) or did you just take SZ's word for it from the simple video he posted?
Upvote
0
Subduction Zone
Regular Member
And you are being less than truthful again.
Yes, I linked a simple video. Why do you keep forgetting the much more in depth paper that I linked too? It is pointless to copy and paste a paper that is several pages long and has many links to the articles that is was based upon. It would take you a good week of reading and studying to get just the paper and its immediate links down pat.
Of course if you could do that you would understand the process and, if you were honest, quit bothering us with nonsense.
So one more time, I posted a simplified video. You could find no flaws in it. I posted the link to the paper the video was based upon. You did not read it. The writer of that paper had links to his sources.
All of your claims of ID have been debunked in the world of science.
Upvote
0
EternalDragon
Counselor
But they are Lassy. Some dinosaur fossils and bones are found just lying around on the surface. Above other strata.
Upvote
0
EternalDragon
Counselor
I did look it over but I'll read it in depth when I get home from work and before I settle in to play a couple hours of Dead Space 3. Happy?
Upvote
0
Subduction Zone
Regular Member
No. Where did you get that idea from?
E.D. please quit making statements that are just wrong without any support.
Upvote
0
Where did you demonstrate this?
Sorry, but empty assertions do not falsify scientific theories. You need evidence.
Upvote
0
Subduction Zone
Regular Member
It is probably written at a level beyond you, but it might help.
Upvote
0
You stil have not told us how a recent global flood is falsifiable.
At this point, it is obvious that no matter what the evidence is you will claim that it was produced by a recent global flood, no matter how preposterous. This is because you start with the conclusion and ignore the evidence.
Upvote
0
A- Pleisiosaurs aren't dinosaurs.
B- when? Please remember what I said about the earth shifting and diagrams, before you answer.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
- Status
Similar threads
