This thread is not the place for it. But if you ever tried to dive into a detail debate on any evolution issue, chances are that neither side could ever get out of the debate and claim winning. This nature of CvE debate says strongly: evolution has problems everywhere (even it is so to Creation too).
Juvenissun, do you frequent other places where evolution is discussed that are not first and foremost Christian forums overpopulated with American creationists? Converse on sites dedicated to zoology or microbiology or marine biology or paleontology?
In secular conversation - not atheist, mind you, just secular - evolution is discussed as an entirely accepted and hugely explanatory and predictive theory. The subjects of discussion are not
if living creatures evolved, but
how they evolved, what mechanisms were influential or causative, the likely sequences and relationships, the practical uses to which such knowledge can be put; the nuts and bolts of how evolution works.
I don't even personally
know a single creationist under the age of eighty, and even at that age they are a rare find in my neck of the woods. It is primarily the peculiar direction a large subset of
American Christianity has taken that causes
anyone to think there is any meaningful controversy to speak of. In most other developed countries, creationists are a vanishing small minority, and most don't try to wedge their notions into the educational system, as they know they would be doomed to failure from the start.
Don't base your assessment of the CvE balance of argument on CF or other religious forums where Americans dominate the conversation, because it will not present to you an accurate reality.