• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

What sword do you choose?

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
7,707
2,518
Perth
✟210,328.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
There are many study bibles available for many English translations but which of them do you use and why?

I avoid NKJV, NIV, NASB bibles because none of them is available in a Catholic edition.

I use RSC-CE, NABRE, JB, NJB, RNJB, GNB-CE, LB-CE, and especially DRB, Knox, and CTS-New Catholic Bible.
 
Last edited:

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,303
1,521
73
Akron
✟57,931.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
which of them do you use and why?
I believe the KJV is authorized. For me that means that God watches over His word to perform what He says He is going to do. The KJV leaves a lot that is not translated so we need to go to the original language and Esp the Hebrew if we want a better understanding. I like the NIV because that is easy to understand. At least when I quote the Bible for others.
 
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
7,707
2,518
Perth
✟210,328.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
I believe the KJV is authorized. For me that means that God watches over His word to perform what He says He is going to do. The KJV leaves a lot that is not translated so we need to go to the original language and Esp the Hebrew if we want a better understanding. I like the NIV because that is easy to understand. At least when I quote the Bible for others.
I have a Cambridge New Paragraph Bible (KJV) which includes the deuterocanonical books, I use it sometimes, but its language is rather archaic and sometimes convoluted.
 
Upvote 0

bling

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Feb 27, 2008
16,833
1,928
✟1,007,764.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
There are many study bibles available for many English translations but which of them do you use and why?

I avoid NKJV, NIV, NASB bibles because none of them is available in a Catholic edition.

I use RSC-CE, NABRE, JB, NJB, RNJB, GNB-CE, LB-CE, and especially DRB, Knox, and CTS-New Catholic Bible.
I will use any English Bible the person I am studying with uses but go to BibleGateway for alternative interpretations. I have six one-on-one studies going with international students, most did not even have a Bible and do not speak much English, so I use the NIV with them, since it was written for people with poor English. We do sometime look at other translations, but I do not like to have to go back to the Greek. I have and use the NJB with some people who feel they are nonpracticing Catholics.
I do not find any one translation best in translating all verses, so I look at several.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,697
20,963
Orlando, Florida
✟1,537,540.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
I believe the KJV is authorized. For me that means that God watches over His word to perform what He says He is going to do. The KJV leaves a lot that is not translated so we need to go to the original language and Esp the Hebrew if we want a better understanding. I like the NIV because that is easy to understand. At least when I quote the Bible for others.

The KJV was authorized by James I of England. Do you think somehow the king of England was anointed by God? Why aren't you Episcopalian or Anglican, then?
 
Upvote 0

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,303
1,521
73
Akron
✟57,931.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
The KJV was authorized by James I of England. Do you think somehow the king of England was anointed by God? Why aren't you Episcopalian or Anglican, then?
Most people do get confused and do not understand what I am saying. I actually am a descendant of the Bible translator that was the first Myrter of Bloody Mary.

Jeremiah 1:12 "The LORD said to me, “You have seen correctly, for I am watching to see that my word is fulfilled.”

I believe this passage in Jeremiah applies to the KJV. Not every wild translation that everyone everywhere has come up with. Let us look at this verse. Some translations use the word "perform", some translations use the word "fulfill".

In summary, "perform" is about carrying out an action or activity, while "fulfill" is about meeting requirements, expectations, goals, or purposes. Both words are used in various contexts and can overlap in certain situations, but they generally emphasize different aspects of actions and outcomes.

The KJV uses the word: "perform". So I would give that word preference over "fulfill" as to what God is saying He is going to do. I say the KJV is "authorized" BY GOD. But that confuses people because they think the KJV was authored by King James. Actually they continued to update the KJV for 300 years. It was not until the NASB cme out that people really began to protest so they gave the new translations a New Name and no longer called them the KJV.

3.08.20-21_52_01.png
screenshot-inthehouseofdavid.com-2023.08.20-21_49_35.png
 

Attachments

  • screenshot-inthehouseofdavid.com-2023.08.20-21_52_01.png
    screenshot-inthehouseofdavid.com-2023.08.20-21_52_01.png
    81.9 KB · Views: 29
Upvote 0

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,303
1,521
73
Akron
✟57,931.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Why aren't you Episcopalian or Anglican, then?
I was an Episcopalian, but the church I attended separated from the Episcopal church because they did not want to be a part of a church that ordained homosexual Bishops. My wife is a Methodist and I am a inactive member of that church. Which is still an Anglican church with the book of common prayer. Although I do not know what that has to do with anything. I am comfortable to attend most any church.
 
Upvote 0

bbbbbbb

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2015
30,823
14,025
74
✟437,733.00
Faith
Non-Denom
I was an Episcopalian, but the church I attended separated from the Episcopal church because they did not want to be a part of a church that ordained homosexual Bishops. My wife is a Methodist and I am a inactive member of that church. Which is still an Anglican church with the book of common prayer. Although I do not know what that has to do with anything. I am comfortable to attend most any church.
But, which church is the Established Church? There is no doubt whatsoever that the Established Church is the Anglican Church. Thus, it is more than reasonable that if someone favors a Bible translation because it is the Authorized Translation, then one ought to belong to the Church which authorized it, which is the Established Church, the Church of England. Also, one ought to be a citizen of the United Kingdom of England, Wales, Scotland, and Ireland, whose monarch (James 1) authorized that translation of the Bible.
 
Upvote 0

PsaltiChrysostom

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2018
1,047
1,005
Virginia
✟79,486.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
I'd like to find something with larger print anymore. I'm tempted to get the Orthodox Study Bible, but I have way too many already. JB, NIV, KJV, NT NIV Greek Interlinear (but the print is tiny!), RSV with Apocrypha, which is my main go to as it has the Orthodox books that even Catholic Bibles don't have.

Does anyone have Bibles on Kindle? I've got the free ESV one, and I do like that I can adjust the type size. However, I like being able to flip around when looking up passages which Kindle just doesn't do well.
 
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
7,707
2,518
Perth
✟210,328.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
I'd like to find something with larger print anymore. I'm tempted to get the Orthodox Study Bible, but I have way too many already. JB, NIV, KJV, NT NIV Greek Interlinear (but the print is tiny!), RSV with Apocrypha, which is my main go to as it has the Orthodox books that even Catholic Bibles don't have.

Does anyone have Bibles on Kindle? I've got the free ESV one, and I do like that I can adjust the type size. However, I like being able to flip around when looking up passages which Kindle just doesn't do well.
I have a large print NEW CATHOLIC BIBLE - Saint Joseph Edition. It's good for Catholic books, but some Orthodox books will be missing.
 
Upvote 0

PsaltiChrysostom

Well-Known Member
Mar 20, 2018
1,047
1,005
Virginia
✟79,486.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
I have a large print NEW CATHOLIC BIBLE - Saint Joseph Edition. It's good for Catholic books, but some Orthodox books will be missing.
Ill have to look into that. But I'll need to let some of my others go. I really don't need all the versions I've got anymore as I'm not really doing comparisons and matching them up to the Greek or anything like that.

The other big thing for me is finding an atlas and a book on customs and culture to help explain things that the Bible doesn't go into. We moved a lot over the years and I think I ended up giving away some of those books at some point.
 
Upvote 0

Diamond72

Dispensationalist 72
Nov 23, 2022
8,303
1,521
73
Akron
✟57,931.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
But, which church is the Established Church?
There are seven churches in Revelation and I believe there are still seven churches today. They were all to take the gospel to the ends of the world in the beginning and that is what they have done. There are also seven spirits according to Revelation 1:4 "To the seven churches in the province of Asia: Grace and peace to you from him who is, and who was, and who is to come, and from the seven spirits before his throne"

Some churches seem to be a combination of two different churches. But every church is one of those seven. If they have the Spirit of God and are not a dead church. I have never actually seen a dead church but I see building that no one is using so the church is not there anymore. The church are the people, we are the temple of God, not a building.
 
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
7,707
2,518
Perth
✟210,328.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
There are seven churches in Revelation and I believe there are still seven churches today.
That's incorrect; there were seven churches in the province of Asia to which saint John was instructed to write. There were many more churches outside of that province and probably many others inside the province of Asia. Nevertheless there was one church that the Lord, Jesus Christ, established and built upon Peter (the rock). And that one church still remains today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lost4words
Upvote 0

bbbbbbb

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2015
30,823
14,025
74
✟437,733.00
Faith
Non-Denom
There are seven churches in Revelation and I believe there are still seven churches today. They were all to take the gospel to the ends of the world in the beginning and that is what they have done. There are also seven spirits according to Revelation 1:4 "To the seven churches in the province of Asia: Grace and peace to you from him who is, and who was, and who is to come, and from the seven spirits before his throne"

Some churches seem to be a combination of two different churches. But every church is one of those seven. If they have the Spirit of God and are not a dead church. I have never actually seen a dead church but I see building that no one is using so the church is not there anymore. The church are the people, we are the temple of God, not a building.
All seven of the churches address in the Revelation ceased to exist centuries ago. None of them authorized the King James translation of the Bible into English, nor any Bible into any other language. We have a problem.
 
Upvote 0

bbbbbbb

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2015
30,823
14,025
74
✟437,733.00
Faith
Non-Denom
That's incorrect; there were seven churches in the province of Asia to which saint John was instructed to write. There were many more churches outside of that province and probably many others inside the province of Asia. Nevertheless there was one church that the Lord, Jesus Christ, established and built upon Peter (the rock). And that one church still remains today.
And that Church, of course, is the Orthodox Church which flourishes despite the intense persecution it has endured throughout its existence.
 
Upvote 0

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
7,707
2,518
Perth
✟210,328.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
All seven of the churches address in the Revelation ceased to exist centuries ago. None of them authorized the King James translation of the Bible into English, nor any Bible into any other language. We have a problem.
Some of them still exist, and none of them would be sponsors of a bible written in English when they do not read English or speak English as their first language. The KJV is one of many English translations that arose in the centuries following the invention of moveable metal type and the printing press. It is not the first, nor the best, I prefer the Douay Rheims Bible over the KJV. I use translations in current English on sites like CF. The KJV does not command my allegiance, but I give it respect.
 
Upvote 0

bbbbbbb

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2015
30,823
14,025
74
✟437,733.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Some of them still exist, and none of them would be sponsors of a bible written in English when they do not read English or speak English as their first language. The KJV is one of many English translations that arose in the centuries following the invention of moveable metal type and the printing press. It is not the first, nor the best, I prefer the Douay Rheims Bible over the KJV. I use translations in current English on sites like CF. The KJV does not command my allegiance, but I give it respect.
I agree with you concerning the role of the KJV in my personal life. As I am sure you know both the KJV and the Douay Rheims have been tweaked over time to improve accuracy and readability. When I ask KJV-centered Christians if they possess, let alone read, the facsimile copy of the 1611 original KJV, they are perplexed and when they actually see it, they struggle with the typeface, especially the use of f for s in many words.
 
Upvote 0