Astridhere
Well-Known Member
- Jul 30, 2011
- 1,240
- 43
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
The link goes nowhere.
Regardless of who you are nothing I produce or interpretations I make are any worse than your changing flavour of the month. End of discussion.
I believe you have misrepresented Dawkins. However I have sufficient without him to support my interpretations that are as unfalsifiable as yours.
Regardless again I say that my own assertions, are just as good as anything you produce.
Here is the latest and the Lucy lovers whose reputation hangs on Lucy are real mad...
Hominid fossils may shake up the human family tree
In a series of reports published in Friday's edition of the journal Science, the researchers describe the Australopithecus sediba specimens as having a curious mix of primitive and modern features that could prompt experts to redraw the human family tree.
Hominid fossils may shake up the human family tree - Los Angeles Times
Oh no not again.....Afarensis out and Sediba in.....with the suite of humanity as well as curved fingers, longer thumb than Ardi and mankind, and curved feet, unlike Lucy apparently, or were they???? Honestly......grasping at staws, all of them. So now you have two species of australopithecus with the 2my old sediba with more primitive feet than Lucy that was found with no feet. Get where I am going with this? Lucy is misrepresented big time by all and sundry.
With some of your evo scientific community not really convinced themselves about who is who in the zoo any interpretation I or anyone gives is as good as 150 years of evolutionary thinking overturned with just one fossil.
Upvote
0