Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Sounds to me like you're all for getting psychological help for us, eh?
Have you ever wondered how we used to be scored if we saw Christian symbols on the Rorschach test?
What's wrong with that?
Just asking --What is wrong with that? Simply that she is misinterpreting scientific data using a flawed logic. Example? Here:
There are literally hundreds of biological characters that are unique to insects. There are also hundreds that are unique to mammals. There are also some that are shared by both groups. What she did with the Turkana boy (and every other one of her posts) was equivalent to taking one of the few shared characters and using to prove her wrong theory.
So, using the insect and mammal example, what she did was the same as saying "both insects and mammals have brains and a nervous system, therefore insects are mammals". After that, she declares herself the "winner". Using her logic, I can make any group belong to any other group. Rats are primates, fish are whales, horses are not mammals, Turkana Boy is an ape, Lucy is an ape, Neanderthals are apes, Humans are closer to pigs than they are to apes, you name it.
As I mentioned here many times, I have nothing against someone saying "God did it". That a personal belief, and I respect that. I even told you that your embedded age hypothesis to me is preferable to trying to spread false science as she does.
Just asking --
[/FONT]Denial is not evidence.
Yeah, rightNow, what she does especially bothers me because none of her flawed "doubts" challenges evolution as a whole, they only challenge small details of it. And even if they challenged evolution, disproving evolution does not automatically prove creationism.
You do not have human transistionals that demonstrate common ancestor to mankind. You do have some evidence of transition from one variety of ape to another and adaptation and that is all.
Hence creation is supported. Evolution predicts intermediates will be found between kinds. Creation predicts there will be no intermediates between kinds.
Is there any evidence, other than the assumption of TOE that this land was undersea so recently given the fauna and flora it was found with? Indeed I see no reason to not take the whale fossils for what simply is apparent, evidence that whales were alive and thriving close to the time of the creation of all life in the sea, as stated in the bible. This evidence more aligns with creation, than evolution.
AV1611VET I think we can clearly see ego stoking targeted ridicule at creationists only demonstrates boofheads that cannot support their psuedo science, and my assertion backed by evidence and interpretation is much more robust and credible. I think evolutionists believe in more miracles than creationists.
Well, when the Antichrist gets here ... that will change.
He will take evolution to the very heights of religious fervor, starting with a display of abiogenesis.
Revelation 13:15 And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.
Those who refuse evolution will be beheaded.
In my opinion.
Cabvet, TOE is full of small theories that support an over arching theory and all of them are no better than your whale rubbish. You are the one peddling crap science in support of desperation and have nothing to offer in your defence instead of global evo agreements that have been falsisfied many times over the past 150 years. Get over yourself and get peddling with something to actually demonstrate your so solid crap that you keep talking and woffling about. Here is one little point and your head for the hills in woffle.
That is no better than "God did it" as a response.
I know evos have difficulty staying on track and deploy to global common knowledge that is falsified by one fossil and dates recalibrated to suit, many changing flavours of the month, ridicule and asides but none of you can defend any of it. I have demonstrated it many times on here and many creationists have seen it.
What is this evidence? Do you seriously think you have some serious evidence that could topple the theory of evolution. You'd be famous...
Of course not. But, she reckons, her "evidence" is as good as anything the proponents of evolution can come up with. You know, since they have no idea what they're talking about, what with 150 years of debunked "science." ... Darls.
I hope that wasn't a reference to me.Heehee
I personally think that Satan uses far different means of separation in Christianity, KJVonlyism to the point where you call people who do not use it not saved for one,
I hope that wasn't a reference to me.
I personally don't know anyone who says that.
Well, in the 5½ years I've been here, I've yet to see it, myself.No, for the most part I don't think you are divisive in what you believe. There are people who have made sweeping generalizations of salvation based on people not reading the KJV, I think that this is far more divisive and far more in detriment to Christianity than some of the things you get up to.
What is this evidence? Do you seriously think you have some serious evidence that could topple the theory of evolution. You'd be famous...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?