Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And I'll continue to 'shoot my mouth off' too.Not hardly - you then proceeded to shoot your mouth off about things that are way beyond your ability.
Rememer what I was addressing?
And I'll continue to 'shoot my mouth off' too.
I don't need to learn the ins and outs of evolutionary philosophy to teach its antithesis.
You do if you want to be taken seriously.And I'll continue to 'shoot my mouth off' too.
I don't need to learn the ins and outs of evolutionary philosophy to teach its antithesis.
I can assure you, I spend more time correcting you guys, than you guys spend time correcting me.
I'm just honest enough to admit that I don't know square about science.
I can assure you, I spend more time correcting you guys, than you guys spend time correcting me.
I'm just honest enough to admit that I don't know square about science.
Fair enough -- count me surprised.Oh... and here's a list of 18 Neanderthals found, one of which is this one:
Maybe they did find King David?... I'd be surprised if they even had a complete skeleton of anything.
Hi thereHi, I'm curious how does a creationist interpret those Archaic Homo sapiens, and other ape-like creatures within 6,000 years of earth history? And I also like to know from an evolutionist stand point within the millions of years range as well. One interpretation I heard from someone is that humans evolved from those ape-like creatures in an accelerated pace in the past, and then somehow they stop evolving since. But this is not a sufficient explanation either, so I'm looking for a plausible explanation from both sides in the hope that I'll become educated on this area. Thanks!
Remember what you actually SAID?
Y'know, what you're desperately backpedalling away from now?
A dozen teeth, you said - eat crow, you were wrong. There is a lot more than that.
(Although thanks for posting the quote - seems like matthew said nothing about complete skeletons, that is entirely your misconception that identification of a species requires a complete skeleton. Thanks again for making this all too easy)
Fish walking on land for the first time having to get its food from the sea turns into a man. A deer does it, and it turns into a whale. Anything goes.They were, at one time, men and women who were contributing members of society -- just like you and I.
At one point in their life, they contracted a disease that altered their bone structure dramatically.
I believe that if they found the bones of King David today, he would be portrayed as a Neanderthal or Cro-Magnon.
Yes, anything goes.Fish walking on land for the first time having to get its food from the sea turns into a man. A deer does it, and it turns into a whale. Anything goes.
So what you're saying is that fish walking onto land for the first time and having to catch its prey in the water (because thats where the food is) will become more land dwelling.Yes, anything goes.
You said it.So what you're saying is that fish walking onto land for the first time and having to catch its prey in the water (because thats where the food is) will become more land dwelling.
While a deer or a hippo (whatever animal is being asserted today) who does the same thing, has to catch its prey in the water, turns into a whale.
Hunting would take place in the ocean though. This is also were predatory pressure would be most influential.The first creature able to spend brief periods on land would have a massive advantage over the rest of the creatures isolated to the oceans. To be able to move to an area that your predator can't follow you to strikes me as exceptionally desirable.
Read "Your Inner Fish," it may help clear up some things in your mind.Hunting would take place in the ocean though. This is also were predatory pressure would be most influential.
On land, no desirable features would be needed against predators because there is no real threat. But in the water, where you spend most of your time getting food, having to evade predators, well, you heard the one about the whale.
Wow --Read "Your Inner Fish," it may help clear up some things in your mind.
By examining fossils and DNA, Shubin shows us that our hands actually resemble fish fins...
Wow --
I have not read the book; and thank you, but I'll pass on said activity.Yes, AVET.... wow! They actually do! Have you read the book? I also recommend it to you.
"One bone, two bones, bunch of little bones, and five fingers..."Wow --
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?