Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
reality says otherwise as they say the proof is in the puddin."Calvinists" are not Calvin. . .your serious mistake is confusing the two.
Such data is not reliable.
God forbid that anyone should take the word of God at its word . .when everyone knows it must be trimmed to fit the notions of man!It is too common to see people zooming in on words in Ephesians 1:1-6
and misinterpreted that God choose individuals to be saved.
Really? I couldn't find one example of "God is love" in any form.Oops! . . .misrepresentation of Calvin demonstrated.
In your personal view. . .which you demonstrate has some problems.the Bible supports me 100% and exposes the false doctrines of fatalism/determinism, double predestination and the calvinist view of Gods sovereignty.
hope this helps !!!
the problem is calvin and his unbiblical views.In your personal view. . .which you demonstrate has some problems.
That is contrary to authoritative NT apostolic teaching that there is only one olive tree of God's people, going all the way back to Abraham (Romans 11:15-18; Galatians 3:28-29).
That interpretation of prophetic riddles is contrary to NT apostolic teaching.
That interpretation is incorrect.
Very revealing to note...Any translation. You may be wright Gene, grace and peace.
the problem is calvin and his unbiblical views.
My question was on Calvinism - not Calvin. You have not studied Calvinism.You're being uninformed.
Calvin is the grace theologian.
Did he claim to cover the whole counsel of God?
Have you read Book III?
Quite honestly, I haven't studied "Calvinism," I've studied Paul.
I argue Paul, not "Calvinism."
But I suspect some of the stuff out here attributed to "Calvinism" is understanding of Calvin.
My question was on Calvinism - not Calvin. You have not studied Calvinism.
Well, if "Calvinism" doesn't purport to be what Calvin writes, why does anyone consider it?My question was on Calvinism - not Calvin. You have not studied Calvinism.
That is a misquote.But I suspect some of the stuff out here attributed to "Calvinism" is understanding of Calvin.
Which is?I think it's an interesting contention and he has a great verse to back himself on it.
"Tis not Calvin whose views are not Biblical. . .the problem is calvin and his unbiblical views.
A verse from NT apostolic teaching, or from his personal interpretation of a prophetic riddle which interpretation disagrees with NT apostolic teaching?
Reality does not determine Scripture, rather Scripture determines reality.reality says otherwise as they say the proof is in the puddin.
And we put some to death in our penal systemand calvin himself persecuted his opposition a very unchristian, unChristlike , unloving , unbiblical act- we are to love our enemies.
acts of hate and no one who hates his brother has eternal life. read 1 John.
Who made that rule?Really? I couldn't find one example of "God is love" in any form.
Who made that rule?
And I likewise can't find one example of "God is Trinity" in the NT.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?