Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
They do write about things like Spiritual Marriage with Christ.Having a wife.
I somehow don't think they would accept you into their fold.They do write about things like Spiritual Marriage with Christ.
It was a time when Courtly Literature was the thing. And that had a way of allowing these women to express their spiritual experiences in the same manor.
That's probably because you have no clue of my spiritual path or of the Beguines for that matter.I somehow don't think they would accept you into their fold.
Also, I think your looking at it backwards. Being mystics, I have no doubt that they would accept me. The Beguines, and other mystics for that matter, were not a club where one had to pass an acceptance test. The test would be in myself and if I wanted to follow the intensity of their spiritual world.I somehow don't think they would accept you into their fold.
Which of these does that mean:(Please start your answer out with either a YES or NO, so I can decide if I want to read the rest or not. Thanks.)
That the universe is 6k old with added age.
Let's set the record straight, shall we?Being mystics, I have no doubt that they would accept me.
The Beguines were Christian lay religious orders that were active in Western Europe, particularly in the Low Countries, in the 13th–16th centuries. Their members lived in semi-monastic communities but did not take formal religious vows. That is, although they promised not to marry "as long as they lived as Beguines," to quote one of the early Rules, they were free to leave at any time.
To question something that isn't even a Christian belief, that is Embodied Age/Maturity of the Earth, makes a person a Christian martyr.You guys are good when that scientific method is on your side; but let it vindicate a Christian, and it can take a hike, can't it?
I read it.Which of these does that mean:
- If you answer Yes, I won't read it.
- If you answer Yes, I will read it.
- If you answer No, I won't read it
- If you answer No, I will read it.
- If you answer Yes, or No I will read it
- If you don't answer Yes, or No I won't read it, because I require an executive summary.
- Other, please specify.
Post 3072 please.What's the point your making?
You have to hear ideas about why something can't come from nothing? Because we've never observed it happening isn't good enough? I have no problem with Life coming from non life but only if there is a life giver involved. If we did observe this happening on some other planet, it only means but this is a method God decided to use to create on that planet.It would help if you could offer some rational reasons why these possibilities couldn't happen or are improbable to happen. I'm open to hearing your ideas, insights or knowledge provided they don't rely on silly arguments such as a god deceiving us or removing all the evidence (this type of god is not worth considering) - "this type of strategy is fine for a child who doesn't know what else do say but for a grown up... not acceptable - "Brethren, be not children in understanding: howbeit in malice be ye children, but in understanding be men". These types of arguments can basically make anything we want happen and feed into all our natural biases and prejudices.
And added age to boot... Thus the deception.
You have to hear ideas about why something can't come from nothing? Because we've never observed it happening isn't good enough? I have no problem with Life coming from non life but only if there is a life giver involved. If we did observe this happening on some other planet, it only means but this is a method God decided to use to create on that planet.
Otherwise it seems to me you're doing exactly what everyone accuses theologians of doing, saying we should take what you loosely call " science" on blind faith.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?