bhsmte
Newbie
Does not matter, a Phd is a Phd and if you do not have one then you are not qualified. The door swings both ways and this applies to science and theology. if they want to quote from an infidel web site and count that as authority then they have to accept the creationist web sites as absolute authority. Otherwise it is a double standard.
I am smart enough to know that Dr Dino does not know what he is talking about when it comes to science. They do not seem to know that infidel dot com does not know what they are talking about when it comes to religion. As Peter says: ignorant and unstable people distort, ...Scriptures, to their own destruction. (2pet3:16)
The infidels, scoffers, apostate or whatever you call them will distort the scriptures then when you explain to them the true meaning they will accuse the Bible scholar of doing the twisting and distorting. They never seem to get tired of going around and around that same may berry bush. No one is forcing anyone to believe in anything. It is logical for a person to be agnostic, lazy but logical. It is logical for people to not accept what science can not verify. What I am referring to are the people that go beyond logic and even make a mockery of science in their attack on God and the written word of God. They almost verify that there must be a God simply because of their venomous attack on the God of the Bible.
Again I am not saying anything at all about their attack on God or on the Bible. I am only talking about their abuse and misuse of science. The very thing that they claim to support but it is just a tool they misuse to reach their real objective. Real men of science should take a stand to support science. If science shows the Bible is accurate and true then they have to let the chips fall where they may because that is what science is all about. You have to go where science takes you. Even if you had no idea that science was going to take you where it does. I had no idea that Noah's flood was NOT a world wide flood. That is where science takes us and so that is where we need to go. If you want to accept science and the Bible.
Does this mean, a Phd biblical historian, uses the same methods in their work as a Phd biologist?
Upvote
0