What is CERN?

[Astropolis]

SHM really ??

I watched part of this and came to the conclusion that the presenter was either 1) perpetrating a really sick joke, 2) completely stark staring mad or 3) scamming gullible viewers out of their money. It's high time for this sort of thing to stop. I am a Christian, I believe in the incarnation and the resurrection of Jesus. Communicating these ideas is made harder by this sort of lunacy being put forward as being in some sense Christian.

While there is room for differing opinions, this isn't an opinion, it's a disgusting lie being put forward as truth. The only question in my mind is how to set about getting this sort of thing off the net as quickly as possible.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Then why on Earth are you even posting in this thread?

I posted here because I had questions about how the theory of evolution can help us to determine what the most healthy diet is. Only now it does not look like anyone knows the answer to that question and evolutionary theory does lend itself to the study of nutrition.

It seems that cultivation demoted food disqualify, not improve it.

 

[joshua 1 9]

Then why on Earth are you even posting in this thread?

The point is that the term particle is a misnomer because the dynamics of particle physics are governed by quantum mechanics.

As such, they exhibit wave-particle duality, displaying particle-like behavior under certain experimental conditions and wave-like behavior in others.

 

[Armoured]

I posted here because I had questions about how the theory of evolution can help us to determine what the most healthy diet is. Only now it does not look like anyone knows the answer to that question and evolutionary theory does lend itself to the study of nutrition.

It seems that cultivation demoted food disqualify, not improve it.

*blink blink*... What the gibbering zombie duck spit does any of that have to do with CERN?

 

[Green Sun]

I posted here because I had questions about how the theory of evolution can help us to determine what the most healthy diet is. Only now it does not look like anyone knows the answer to that question and evolutionary theory does lend itself to the study of nutrition.

It seems that cultivation demoted food disqualify, not improve it.

W-What?

This thread was never about evolution.

 

[morningstar2651]

It seems that cultivation demoted food disqualify, not improve it.

This is textbook word salad (graphorrhea to be specific). I recommend seeing a doctor immediately as this is typically a symptom of neurological problems.

 

[tulc]

I posted here because I had questions about how the theory of evolution can help us to determine what the most healthy diet is. Only now it does not look like anyone knows the answer to that question and evolutionary theory does lend itself to the study of nutrition.

It seems that cultivation demoted food disqualify, not improve it.

hmmm...did you post this in the wrong thread?
tulc(has done that when involved in several discussions at the same time)

 

[joshua 1 9]

W-What?

This thread was never about evolution.

I may have gotten the threads mixed up because I often have 10 or 12 different questions I am answering from my alert button. I can ignore the cern thread if people want sense it was moved and it does not seem to be going anywhere.

 

[Tina W]

Lol. No.

You seem to be thinking of images such as these:

There are many iconic works showing the Last Judgment, Christ is shown encircled in glory (that's what you are seeing as circles here, not dimensional vortexes or stargates). In the above is a particular example that is clearly influenced by the text of the Apocalypse where Christ rides upon a white horse with a sword protruding from His mouth--though in most cases it is like the second. Which is a near identical mirror of what icons of the Ascension show:

So notice how in both icons of the Last Judgment and the Ascension show Christ encircled in glory, in the Ascension accompanied by angels upward, in the Last Judgment coming downward (and often showing the saints, such as in the one I posted second with the Virgin Mary on one hand and John the Baptist on the other). In the Acts of the Apostles when Christ ascends the angels tell His followers that in the same way they see Him ascending He shall return, so it shouldn't be shocking that images of Christ's ascension and images of Christ's parousia would contain a similar motif.

Christ is depicted in His heavenly glory, as the Risen Lord who in the Ascension takes up His seat at the right hand of God the Father to reign as King of kings and Lord of lords; in the Last Judgment Christ is depicted as the Lord of Glory, the Great Judge before whom all must stand and give an account on the last day.

It's a good idea to learn how to read religious icons and art before interjecting modern science fiction themes. Because, really, do you think Christians a thousand years ago or before were imagining stargates or wormholes? Or think maybe they were more familiar with using certain forms of imagery to depict things such as halos of light as metaphorical depictions of divinity and glory? My guess is the latter.

-CryptoLutheran

Those are pretty pictures, I can't believe someone looked at that and thought the circles were stargates. LOL This thread is too funny. I love the stargate series I have it on DVD but it is not real, it's just fiction. Stargates don't really exist. This thread is too funny.

 

[Farm Truck]

Just windows.

Doors too!

Of course they are trying to talk to demons... it's what they do!

 

[Jaxxi]

Yea iam kind of new here lol so.i got confused on where to post my topic in the right place.
But cern is the last and final effort at opening dimensional portals,only this time without so many incantations just raw power, atoms colliding at high speeds to force a portal open

Every other attempt has been unsuccessful. That Hadron collider is the largest man made machine and runs 17 miles long underground. It is enormous and on Sept. 24th 2015 they will be cranking it up to 3x what its done before. The Pope is going to be speaking to the U.S. Congress for the first time on that day. It marks a day of darkness, as Cerns logo is 666 in a circle, and is funded largely by the Vatican. It absolutely terrifies me. They dont know what they are messing with and it will affect us all. The last time they cranked it up to half of what they are going to, they saw apparitions in the portal.

 

[Armoured]

, and is funded largely by the Vatican.

Seriously?

 

[pgp_protector]

Every other attempt has been unsuccessful. That Hadron collider is the largest man made machine and runs 17 miles long underground. It is enormous and on Sept. 24th 2015 they will be cranking it up to 3x what its done before. The Pope is going to be speaking to the U.S. Congress for the first time on that day. It marks a day of darkness, as Cerns logo is 666 in a circle, and is funded largely by the Vatican. It absolutely terrifies me. They dont know what they are messing with and it will affect us all. The last time they cranked it up to half of what they are going to, they saw apparitions in the portal.

 

[ViaCrucis]

Seriously?

Every other attempt has been unsuccessful. That Hadron collider is the largest man made machine and runs 17 miles long underground. It is enormous and on Sept. 24th 2015 they will be cranking it up to 3x what its done before. The Pope is going to be speaking to the U.S. Congress for the first time on that day. It marks a day of darkness, as Cerns logo is 666 in a circle, and is funded largely by the Vatican. It absolutely terrifies me. They dont know what they are messing with and it will affect us all. The last time they cranked it up to half of what they are going to, they saw apparitions in the portal.

Lol.

Here, let me at least address this one:

Now, color me crazy, but I don't see 666 here.

If we momentarily pretend that these are supposed to be sixes then we have five sixes not three.

But, okay, now let's humor you and admit that there are three sixes here (there isn't, but, let's ignore that for the sake of argument). The number of the Beast as described in the Apocalypse of St. John isn't three sixes, it isn't six-six-six. It's the number six hundred and sixty-six.

This is pretty easily seen when looking at just about any Greek manuscript, but it's sufficient just to look at a couple English translations, such as the KJV:

"Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six."

or the NASB:

"Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for the number is that of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six."

or Young's Literal translation:

"Here is the wisdom! He who is having the understanding, let him count the number of the beast, for the number of a man it is, and its number is six hundred and sixty six."

But you know how I mentioned it was most obvious in the original Greek? That's because while some manuscripts do write the number out, most give the numerical value using Greek numerals:

These are the Greek characters Chi, Xi, and Stigma. Stigma was retained almost purely as a numerical character, its value being 6, with the letters Chi and Xi having the values of 600 and 60 respectively. Since Greek numerals are additive you write the values next to each other highest to lowest, adding them. So ΧΞϛ becomes 600 + 60 + 6.

Some manuscripts read Chi Iota Stigma, or 600 + 10 + 6, or 616.

So the number is not six-six-six, it isn't three sixes; it's six hundred and sixty-six (or alternatively six hundred and sixteen).

-CryptoLutheran

 

[Jaxxi]

Lol.

Here, let me at least address this one:

Now, color me crazy, but I don't see 666 here.

If we momentarily pretend that these are supposed to be sixes then we have five sixes not three.

But, okay, now let's humor you and admit that there are three sixes here (there isn't, but, let's ignore that for the sake of argument). The number of the Beast as described in the Apocalypse of St. John isn't three sixes, it isn't six-six-six. It's the number six hundred and sixty-six.

This is pretty easily seen when looking at just about any Greek manuscript, but it's sufficient just to look at a couple English translations, such as the KJV:

"Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six."

or the NASB:

"Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for the number is that of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six."

or Young's Literal translation:

"Here is the wisdom! He who is having the understanding, let him count the number of the beast, for the number of a man it is, and its number is six hundred and sixty six."

But you know how I mentioned it was most obvious in the original Greek? That's because while some manuscripts do write the number out, most give the numerical value using Greek numerals:

These are the Greek characters Chi, Xi, and Stigma. Stigma was retained almost purely as a numerical character, its value being 6, with the letters Chi and Xi having the values of 600 and 60 respectively. Since Greek numerals are additive you write the values next to each other highest to lowest, adding them. So ΧΞϛ becomes 600 + 60 + 6.

Some manuscripts read Chi Iota Stigma, or 600 + 10 + 6, or 616.

So the number is not six-six-six, it isn't three sixes; it's six hundred and sixty-six (or alternatively six hundred and sixteen).

-CryptoLutheran

Let me humor you back and tell you that you clearly missed the point of the post. Ok so they have six hundred and sixty-six hidden in their logo, sorry for the mistake. Reread my post and focus on the TOPIC this time.

 

[Armoured]

Let me humor you back and tell you that you clearly missed the point of the post. Ok so they have six hundred and sixty-six hidden in their logo, sorry for the mistake. Reread my post and focus on the TOPIC this time.

Still waiting for a citation suggesting the Vatican funds CERN to any significant degree.

 

[Jaxxi]

Lol.

Here, let me at least address this one:

Now, color me crazy, but I don't see 666 here.

If we momentarily pretend that these are supposed to be sixes then we have five sixes not three.

But, okay, now let's humor you and admit that there are three sixes here (there isn't, but, let's ignore that for the sake of argument). The number of the Beast as described in the Apocalypse of St. John isn't three sixes, it isn't six-six-six. It's the number six hundred and sixty-six.

This is pretty easily seen when looking at just about any Greek manuscript, but it's sufficient just to look at a couple English translations, such as the KJV:

"Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six."

or the NASB:

"Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for the number is that of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six."

or Young's Literal translation:

"Here is the wisdom! He who is having the understanding, let him count the number of the beast, for the number of a man it is, and its number is six hundred and sixty six."

But you know how I mentioned it was most obvious in the original Greek? That's because while some manuscripts do write the number out, most give the numerical value using Greek numerals:

These are the Greek characters Chi, Xi, and Stigma. Stigma was retained almost purely as a numerical character, its value being 6, with the letters Chi and Xi having the values of 600 and 60 respectively. Since Greek numerals are additive you write the values next to each other highest to lowest, adding them. So ΧΞϛ becomes 600 + 60 + 6.

Some manuscripts read Chi Iota Stigma, or 600 + 10 + 6, or 616.

So the number is not six-six-six, it isn't three sixes; it's six hundred and sixty-six (or alternatively six hundred and sixteen).

-CryptoLutheran

Well you have completely missed the point! While I stand corrected, CERN has six hundred sixty- six hidden in their logo, try rereading my post and find the TOPIC this time.

 

[Jaxxi]

Still waiting for a citation suggesting the Vatican funds CERN to any significant degree.

its through money laundering but it cannot be proven so I take it back..but they ARE in cahoots with one another. There is something sinister behind it.

 

[Armoured]

its through money laundering but it cannot be proven so I take it back..but they ARE in cahoots with one another. There is something sinister behind it.

If it can't be proven, what makes you think they are "in cahoots"? What path does the money laundering take? I admit, I don't know an awful lot about CERN's funding, but I'd imagine it's mostly, if not entirely, funded by EU nations, isn't it?

 

[ViaCrucis]

Well you have completely missed the point! While I stand corrected, CERN has six hundred sixty- six hidden in their logo, try rereading my post and find the TOPIC this time.

Nope, they don't. You obviously missed the point of my post. I understood the point of your post.

-CryptoLutheran