Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yea iam kind of new here lol so.i got confused on where to post my topic in the right place.
But cern is the last and final effort at opening dimensional portals,only this time without so many incantations just raw power, atoms colliding at high speeds to force a portal open
Ok, so I'm looking back through the thread to see what is going on.That was not my point. It is really not important how they try to justify their decision. Lame excuses are not going to stand up before God.
This isn't correct.All browsers are required by the supreme court to block objectionable material. They give everyone the option to turn the blocker off so all that filth and scrum can flood their computer.
In China I think they ban objectionable material so the students have to install a different browser to receive material that is banned by the Government. So that no one can stumble across it by accident.
You said it was required by the government to filter.All browsers are required by the supreme court to block objectionable material. They give everyone the option to turn the blocker off so all that filth and scrum can flood their computer.
If parents want they can install software that blocks their children from having access to questionable material. I think most parents never give it any thought. I just checked my son's computer and I did not find anything objectionable.
What do I care what their lame reason or supposed justification was. The result is still the same. The supreme court struck down the laws designed to protect children from being exposed to pornography and other internet filth and debauchery. They failed to do their job of protecting our youth from defilement.
You already present lots of information on the subject. I do not feel any need to prove anything. It is what it. Like you people can do their own research.Ok, so I'm looking back through the thread to see what is going on.
If I'm correct, the proof of the demons over the internet (Demons over Internet Protocol as I would call them) is the potentially objectionable content (such as pornography) that exists online. In order for someone to see the proof, they would have to disable the blockers such as Google's Safe Search or something like Parental Filters on most browsers. The blockers you are talking about are like Parental Filters and Safe Search.
However...
This isn't correct.
If you're talking about the Supreme Court case with browser blockers, that was about public libraries and public schools. The Supreme Court rules in United States v. American Library Ass'n that Congress has the authority to require public schools and require public schools and library receiving federal funds related to internet access to install filtering devices to prevent children from seeing obscene or pornographic images as per the Children's Online Protection Act.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._American_Library_Ass'n#Conclusion
A browser is not required to come with filtering software, most websites will pornography or otherwise adult content will ask if you are over 18 before letting you visit however. This is to limit legal liability to the owner of the site. If a minor went on the site and did say 'yes', the owner would not be liable as they did make a reasonable effort to block a minor from entering the site, and the minor lied about their age/the parents were not supervising the minor's browsing. Similarly, Google enables safe-search automatically, to give themselves limited liability as it must be disabled and the button to disabled has a warning it might result in viewing adult content.
China meanwhile has censors in place to block quite a lot of things, such as information about The Tienanmen Square Riots and other political dissent. However, this involves things like preventing IP addresses from being routed through to the censored site using the servers the browser is attempting to hop through to reach it's goal. Almost all of the censoring is not browser-based, rather it is server based, and thus in greater control by the government as it cannot be edited on the user's machine. The ways of getting around this are a bit more difficult than simply using a different browser. This would involve using proxy servers and using a VPN or SSH to a computer outside of China. The government there has been trying to crack down on this and has blocked many of the free or popular VPN services have been blocked.
So no, it is not required by law in the United States for browsers to filter out content. The closest thing to what you state is that sites with potentially dangerous to minors material must make a reasonable effort to prevent minors from accessing it.
I still would like a bit of clarification on the contradictions you presented. You first stated:
You said it was required by the government to filter.
You then said that it was up to the parents:
You then said that the Supreme Court was openly allowing pornography into the hands of minors.
How do you reconcile the contradiction between:
"Blocking objectionable material is required by the Supreme Court"
and
"The Supreme Court has struck down laws that blocked objectionable material from minors"
There are many tapestries that hang in ancient churches that depict the second coming of Christ. In these tapestries the heavenly host arrive in a whirlwind that opens up a dimensional doorway the tapestries show Christ returning in what appears to be a dimensional door or stargate. Well now we know that they will use this to usher in the counterfeit return of Jesus Christ the antichrist whom will come impersonating Jesus Christ this will be the biggest deception of all time
You already present lots of information on the subject. I do not feel any need to prove anything. It is what it. Like you people can do their own research.
Glad you see that I did do the research. I take it that the facts have been made clear now.You already present lots of information on the subject. I do not feel any need to prove anything. It is what it. Like you people can do their own research.
[citation needed]There are accounts of ancient Sumer SPEAKING about so called gods(fallen angels) coming through a double pillard stargate and there have been carvings that represented such
It makes as much sense as counting to potato; I like chocolate pudding.I am not quite sure what the connection is with the claim that cern is opening portals.
I know enough programming that I can browse without a graphical browser. Where is your proof?I do have proof. But you will need to turn off or disable the blocker they have on your internet browser, if you want to see what I am talking about.
Someone has never been on 4chan.All browsers are required by the supreme court to block objectionable material. They give everyone the option to turn the blocker off so all that filth and scrum can flood their computer. In China I think they ban objectionable material so the students have to install a different browser to receive material that is banned by the Government. So that no one can stumble across it by accident.
I've never had to unblock porn to view it. Maybe you're browsing the wrong sites.Otherwise the porn is blocked by default so that you have to click on a button to view material that results in the ruin of many people.
Or we can simply dismiss your posts as unfounded claims pulled out of the usual place.You already present lots of information on the subject. I do not feel any need to prove anything. It is what it. Like you people can do their own research.
You can if you want, that is fine with me. Only problem with your logic is that I am not making any claims. I have no interest in making any claims. So that pretty much just leaves you to having to deal with your own shadow. No reason to get me involved in it.Or we can simply dismiss your posts as unfounded claims pulled out of the usual place.
The brower requires you to set your preferences when you first use it. It is little more then clicking on a button that is no different then any other button your clicking on. So your actually making my point for me that the supreme court is not providing adequate protection for our youth, here in this country and around the world.I've never had to unblock porn to view it. Maybe you're browsing the wrong sites.
You want me to make a claim? Ok my claim is that Cern will not blow up the universe. So far I am right in the claim I am making because we are still here having this conversation. You can claim that Cern will blow up the universe if you want. Only if that were to happen we would no longer be having this conversation and you would not be able to say I was right.That is the usual response from people who make claims but can't support them.
Hawking. Stephen Hawking. I see this misspelling a lot, and always wonder if people are conflating him with Richard Dawkins (hence Hawkins), seeing as they're both godless science types...Steven Hawkins is one of the most respected scientists on this planet (in the eyes of most men), and the warnings Hawkins is issuing in respects to playing in this area of things the way they are is above and beyond what I would expect, which warnings pertain to blowing up the universe type of warnings (and he is an athiest).
So the question you have to ask yourself is, how big is the collider at CERN? Is it bigger than the Earth? Now, we know the LHC has a circumference of 17 miles. So, if you think that's bigger than the Earth, then maybe this is quite a risky thing for particle physicists to be doing. But if you think the LHC is smaller than the Earth, then you can relax, as there is no possibility of it generating anything close to sufficienty energy to create instability in the Higgs field.Hawking said:A particle accelerator that reaches 100bn GeV would be larger than Earth
Please say more. Please let us know where you read that 'paranormal activity' has been observed. You can't just throw in a claim like that with no extrapolation or links to back it up. It's obviously nonsense, but I would quite like to see the source of such nonsense.the scientist as they dig further are apparently running into paranormal ativity and thats all I will say.
I managed to watch about 10 minutes of this tripe. I can't work out whether this guy is more of a liar than he is an idiot, or the other way around.
According to Tyson if you want to blow up the earth, or the universe, then all you would need is to insert more energy then what is currently holding them together. I will do one better then Tyson, just turn off the energy holding them together and they will "explode" or begin to expand all by themselves.I had to stop it at the point that, after misquoting and grossly misunderstanding statements from both Hawking and Neil Degrasse-Tyson,
According to Tyson if you want to blow up the earth, or the universe, then all you would need is to insert more energy then what is currently holding them together. I will do one better then Tyson, just turn off the energy holding them together and they will "explode" or begin to expand all by themselves.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?