Right, it's best to look in the places where the most significant costs are, if one wants to economize. While in my mind I actually keep track from different stores of the prices of milk and eggs and tortillas and so on, the main way to save money for most people is usually to look at the biggest items that cost the most. But still, if one store charges a $1 more for the same milk (gallon organic), then I notice that, and so on.
You mentioned someone trying to cover up inflation..... I recall above you said that.
Well, the opposite would be a wrong also. Someone trying to give people a clearly false impression that a just normal grocery shopping inflation is over 100% for instance when it's nowhere close to that.
Don't you think?
So, to me, if someone like the above person in the thread paid $458 (they said) for what used to cost $200, then of course a lot of things could be going on, like buying more, different brands, or Russian goods (an extreme example might be Russian caviar, because it's hard to even imagine going from $200 to $300, much less another $150 more! (so, something is going on there, and it's frankly not believable that it's just ordinary groceries like 98% of people buy, and also of the same kinds as in the past. If you and me see 10% and 20% inflation, that will be representative. When someone claimed 125% inflation, it's not credible/believable. They are being deceptive somehow, like not telling us some key, central fact or such, but trying to imply that food inflation is over 100% when it is not for the overwhelming majority of common food things that almost any family does buy, where instead inflation has been much lower than 100%+)