Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
tisk tisk on the thread voodoo.
tisk tisk on the thread voodoo.
If I believed that, then I would be buying into one of evolution's oldest lies: casteism.
Why not?
I think the phenomenon called phenotypic plasticity disproves evolution. Plasticity, I say, is one of the little-known things that occur in nature that could make it LOOK like things evolved. This is simply an individual animal's ability to change as the environment changes. I submit that every animal on earth has a degree of plasticity. In fact, many animals can change colors, sizes, shapes and even behaviors based on environment. There is a degree of how fast this can happen, and there are varying degrees of this throughout the animal kingdom.
I also submit that every creature on earth is a product of their internal and external environments. In fact, these environments are in active communication at all times. For example, when a snail is in the presence of a predator, he is able to grow a thicker shell in an attempt to protect himself. When individual fish change environments they are often able to change colors. They can also change sizes. Lizards are the same way. They can even shrink. Many mammals are able to quickly change their coat/fur color upon a change in environment. Also phenotypes are helped shaped by one's diet. Beaks, bills, teeth, jaws and more are quickly adaptive to the food one eats. -- I have tons of links but I cannot post them yet due to board rules
To me this is simple disproof of neo-darwinism because the necessary information must already reside the genome to decipher external conditions. I would like an evolutionist to tell me how this is incorrect.....and how else could an animal adapt to a variety of different environments if this built-in potential for variation did not already reside in the genome?
Also if each individual animal is quickly adaptive, then why should it have to wait thousands of years for darwin's version of adaptation to kick in? And the fact is, evolutionists do not have a biolgical mechanism for plasticity....thus they tend to ignore its significance. But I submit that plasticity alone could account for a large percentage of the so-called "evolution" that's observed in the fossil record. S
p.s...It's nice to find this form
Really AVET... there was NO good reason for resurrecting this thread... although it did remind me why I put Gottservant on ignore!
-- You have Gottservant on IGNORE???
What on earth for?
![[serious]](/data/avatars/m/160/160873.jpg?1431539545){kind=avatar}
