F
FrancesJames09
Guest
See, I'm a Roman Catholic and I always had a different notion considering abortion. I do consider abortion to be wrong; it's simply a personal conviction--I don't like it and I don't like that there are women who are put in the position where they feel like they have to have abortions; but there is one thing that my mother, my mother having been born in 1942, told me that had me not rethinking my dislike of abortion, but simply how I thought about the matter. I'll Explain--
My mother was brought up during a time when abortion was illegal. She had heard stories of women performing abortions on themselves in order to rid themselves of unwanted children. It didn't matter to these women whether abortion was legal or not--they were having abortion and in some instances getting themselves killed. The point being, my mother would tell me here, that making abortion illegal doesn't get rid of the problem. Whether it's legal or not, women are going to have them.
What will happen to these women? Will they throw themselves down stairs to get rid of their children? Will they take pills? Will they use coat hangers or syringes and wind up getting a possibly lethal infection? These are the questions and situations that will suddenly start popping up if abortion were made illegal.
So ask yourself, my mother said, what is the worse of these two evils? That abortion remain legal and where a woman might have a chance to think, to live a good healthy life; or for her to risk her life; or that abortion is illegal and the woman still has an abortion at the risk of her own life?
I am pro-life, and that's why the majority of my focus is on making social condiotions better where maybe women won't have to have abortions any more, because I know for a certainty that simply making abortion illegal isn't going to solve the problem.
The question to me is an entirely different one. Pro-life is what I am, because I don't like abortion, war, nor the death penalty. I'm pro-choice, because being anti-choice is the worse of those two evils.
My mother was brought up during a time when abortion was illegal. She had heard stories of women performing abortions on themselves in order to rid themselves of unwanted children. It didn't matter to these women whether abortion was legal or not--they were having abortion and in some instances getting themselves killed. The point being, my mother would tell me here, that making abortion illegal doesn't get rid of the problem. Whether it's legal or not, women are going to have them.
What will happen to these women? Will they throw themselves down stairs to get rid of their children? Will they take pills? Will they use coat hangers or syringes and wind up getting a possibly lethal infection? These are the questions and situations that will suddenly start popping up if abortion were made illegal.
So ask yourself, my mother said, what is the worse of these two evils? That abortion remain legal and where a woman might have a chance to think, to live a good healthy life; or for her to risk her life; or that abortion is illegal and the woman still has an abortion at the risk of her own life?
I am pro-life, and that's why the majority of my focus is on making social condiotions better where maybe women won't have to have abortions any more, because I know for a certainty that simply making abortion illegal isn't going to solve the problem.
The question to me is an entirely different one. Pro-life is what I am, because I don't like abortion, war, nor the death penalty. I'm pro-choice, because being anti-choice is the worse of those two evils.
Upvote
0