• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What I don't understand about the arguement for Abortion.

purpledolphin8402

Regular Member
Feb 10, 2010
577
26
United States
✟15,906.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Notice brain waves develop at 6 weeks.

You are more than welcome to produce a development chart from a scientific source to refute this chart.

From the Mayo Clinic fetal development in the first trimester:

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/prenatal-care/PR00112
 
Upvote 0

mathetes123

Newbie
Dec 26, 2011
2,469
54
✟18,144.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
purpledolphin8402 said:
From the Mayo Clinic fetal development in the first trimester:

[/URL]

By posting this are you making a case for or against abortion as the pictures make it quite clear just how far developed the baby is in the first trimester. It is clearly not just a blob of tissue.
 
Upvote 0

SaraJarvis

Newbie
Apr 2, 2012
293
8
England
✟22,975.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Labour
By posting this are you making a case for or against abortion as the pictures make it quite clear just how far developed the baby is in the first trimester. It is clearly not just a blob of tissue.
If you compare it to the chart that you posted, then you will notice some differences. Fingernails, for instance. Your chart stated that in week 6 fingernails begin to develop. This chart states that they don't develop until week 12.
 
Upvote 0

purpledolphin8402

Regular Member
Feb 10, 2010
577
26
United States
✟15,906.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
By posting this are you making a case for or against abortion as the pictures make it quite clear just how far developed the baby is in the first trimester. It is clearly not just a blob of tissue.

Neither. You asked for a scientific source to refute your chart. I provided it. Obviously you didn't read it. Your source claimed that there was brain activity at 6 weeks and fingers at 7. By 7 weeks the head is just starting to form and there are no fingers. The fetus is only barely the size of a pencil eraser. If you want accurate fetal development, go to a medical site, not a christian or pro-life site. I've seen where they show pics of a 12 week fetus and say it's only 4 weeks into development. Also, a lot of pics they show aren't even of abortions, but miscarriages.
 
Upvote 0

Trogool

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2012
2,839
90
✟3,694.00
Faith
Christian
Politics
US-Green
By posting this are you making a case for or against abortion as the pictures make it quite clear just how far developed the baby is in the first trimester. It is clearly not just a blob of tissue.

Are you seriously relying on gross morphology to make an argument for embryological development? LOL.
 
Upvote 0

purpledolphin8402

Regular Member
Feb 10, 2010
577
26
United States
✟15,906.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Notice brain waves develop at 6 weeks.

You are more than welcome to produce a development chart from a scientific source to refute this chart.

Impossible. The "brain" at that point is smaller than the head of a pin. The paper that was used for that information published by Dr. H. Hamlin who claimed that EEG picked up brain waves in a 6 week old fetus, was later debunked. Brain waves are not detected until between 16-20 weeks of pregnancy.
 
Upvote 0

mathetes123

Newbie
Dec 26, 2011
2,469
54
✟18,144.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married

I would first ask that you provide links to support your assertions. If what you say is true, would you support laws to make abortion illegal after 16 weeks?
 
Upvote 0

SaraJarvis

Newbie
Apr 2, 2012
293
8
England
✟22,975.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Labour
It greatly amuses me how any evidence posted by those for abortion, is entirely overlooked. I think you'll find an awful lot of information about a page back, that I found for you (after you repeatedly asked me). This was then ignored. That evidence combined with the above chart should answer some of your questions. Go on, have a read. No one will smite you down.
 
Upvote 0

julian the apostate

rule byzantium
Jun 2, 2004
1,146
72
✟1,678.00
Faith
Anglican
And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

Many protestants before they realized what a great fundraising tool abortion was, used to take the above position regarding abortion, something like viability.
there is a difference between a zygote and a kindergartner
 
Upvote 0

technofox

Newbie
Jun 12, 2007
1,409
69
Earth
✟24,631.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

^This is probably the most rational statement I have ever read.

Personally I am against abortion as a form of birth control; however, I am supportive of a woman's choice in terms of medical necessity, rape, or incest.

As for aborting a child with severe medical abnormalities, that is a tough one that I have never thought of; especially in the case of the expense and resources required to support that child on not only the family, but society as a whole. What are your thoughts?

I may start a thread later today on this to get both conservative and liberal viewpoints on the above issue. Personally I can't decide what I would do in that situation. My gf is pro-choice all the way, except in marriage, then she shares the same views as I currebtly hold; however, I ask her to see what her POV is on abortion of a severely handicaped child.
 
Upvote 0

SaraJarvis

Newbie
Apr 2, 2012
293
8
England
✟22,975.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Labour
The thing is, abortion isn't always used as birth control. Yes, there are women out there who don't take the right precautions, and say "Nevermind, I'll have an abortion", which is just ridiculous, because it should be the last thing on the list, when a failure in contraception occurs. Most women who have abortions have been using either the pill or condoms. Neither are 100% effective, and the woman in question shouldn't have to pay the price for these contraceptive failures. Many women have very good reasons not to become pregnant; they could be underage, in school, university, beginning a career, in the prime of their career, or very poor and unable to afford a child. A woman should not be forced to bear the burden of a contraceptive mishap. Abortion is an ordeal in itself, and even if the woman in question has used it as a form of birth control, she will definitely not wish to go through that agony again, and attempt to take more control over those aspects of her sex life.
 
Upvote 0

technofox

Newbie
Jun 12, 2007
1,409
69
Earth
✟24,631.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Very thought provoking post. Especially the financial burden of raising children; however, the high costs of raising a child, in my option, is the fault of our society here in the USA. We lack universal health care and have the highest cost per capita in the world for health care. It's quite sad an unfortunately it's the poor and uneducated that tend to vote against universal health care, because of sound bites from Fox News or because they think they can't afford the higher taxes on their meager salaries.
 
Upvote 0

mathetes123

Newbie
Dec 26, 2011
2,469
54
✟18,144.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married

Either abortion is right or wrong. You can't have it both ways. If it is wrong as a form of birth control, it is wrong in other circumstances.
 
Upvote 0

technofox

Newbie
Jun 12, 2007
1,409
69
Earth
✟24,631.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
mathetes123 said:
Either abortion is right or wrong. You can't have it both ways. If it is wrong as a form of birth control, it is wrong in other circumstances.

Not everything is as black & white as it seems my friend. I am against it for the most part personally; however, the poster that you have responded to has a very good point.

Excluding rape, incest, and medical necessity; money is another major factor as to why abortions happen. This is the fault of our western society making health care and raising a child far to expensive than need be. If we can make raising kids less of a burden than currently, then you will see abortion rates drop dramatically.

Look at the abortion statistics, the largest numbers of abortions happen in states with the highest levels of poverty. Sadly much of this is found in the bible belt of the USA making Christians appear to be hypocrites. This one of the reasons why I believe universal health care may help save lives via reducing the expense of child birth and raising a child (i.e. reduces the rate of abortions).
 
Reactions: Minty
Upvote 0

purpledolphin8402

Regular Member
Feb 10, 2010
577
26
United States
✟15,906.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Either abortion is right or wrong. You can't have it both ways. If it is wrong as a form of birth control, it is wrong in other circumstances.

That's not true. It's wrong to take someone's life because you just feel like killing someone, but if someone is breaking into your home and about to kill you, is it wrong to kill them in self defense? As one poster already said, not everything is black and white. The case of the 9 year old girl in Brazil who was raped by her step-father comes to mind. She became pregnant with twins, and there was no way her little body could have handled that pregnancy without sever complications. She had an abortion. Are you implying that it would have better if that little girl died instead of having an abortion?
 
Upvote 0

SaraJarvis

Newbie
Apr 2, 2012
293
8
England
✟22,975.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Labour
I fully agree with you when it comes to the healthcare issue. The mere thought of bringing a child into a world where a person barely has enough money to take care of themselves is petrifying. Unfortunately, they're fed all kinds of rubbish through the media, and are practically brainwashed by these ultra-conservative ideals. If money was the only issue preventing a woman from having a child, then universal healthcare and the like would most certainly aid them. Of course, there are many other issues, too, but money is a huge factor. For instance, there is no way I could have had a baby; I live off a student loan and my family are struggling to make ends meet on benefits. A baby just wouldn't have been possible.

Either abortion is right or wrong. You can't have it both ways. If it is wrong as a form of birth control, it is wrong in other circumstances.
I'm not trying to have it both ways. I'm offering you the bigger picture. When I say as a form of birth control, I mean if the woman was relying soley upon abortion, and not taking the pill or using condoms. As a form of birth control, it is uneducated. However, in the cases of younger women, this is due to the lack of sex education in schools, etc. I didn't say that it is wrong; I said it is ridiculous to rely upon abortion as a means of birth control - but not wrong. I would also like to state that it is only ridiculous if it is an informed, mature woman relying upon it as birth control. However, it is in no way wrong. No matter how she thinks, it is still her body and her life; therefore she has a right to do what she will.

Instead of all of these anti-abortion groups standing outside abortion clinics, and trying to humiliate and scare women; why don't they go and hand out free condoms in schools? Why don't they vote for proper healthcare? The most recent conservative argument I heard was "We shouldn't have to pay for women's birth control!". But they'll still howl that abortion is disgusting at the first chance they get. Now that is the epitome of hypocrisy.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0