What has President Trump's time in office done to you, personally?

Foxfyre said:

My husband and I won't see any increase as we are now retired and no longer receive wages, but that's okay. Just to see the country be restored to economic stability and more opportunity for everybody will make for a happier society for us too.

Click to expand...

We had already seen our country restored to economic stability over the past administration.

Yarddog said:

We had already seen our country restored to economic stability over the past administration.

Click to expand...

Sorry but I was in a business that allowed me to review many hundreds of business financials--P&Ls, payroll, gross receipts etc.--during Obama's administration. And I can assure you there was no economic stability. The economy and what it did to people was pathetic under the Obama Administration. More people not working. Far too many people who were working having to do so with reduced hours or multiple part time jobs due to the horrendous taxes disguised as healthcare reform during the Obama administration. Unemployment among black people and Hispanics was stagnant or skyrocketed under Obama. It was coming down the last few years mostly because so many had dropped out of the work force entirely. Household incomes and net worth declined under Obama. Few business start ups and a lot of business closings under Obama.

Unemployment continues to drop under President Trump not because people are dropping out of the work force as was mostly the case under Obama, but because people are going back to work. Unemployment among black people and Hispanics is at the lowest point in U.S. history even though more black people and Hispanics are now working. There are jobs again for many more people who want them. There were 123 million folks in the work force in January 2017 and 126 million in the work force in December 2017. And with corporations bringing their operations and capital back home, it shouldn't be long before anybody who wants a good paying, permanent full time job can get one.

For the life of me, I can't understand why dogmatic leftists are so unwilling to acknowledge and appreciate and feel good about good economic news.

But then I can't understand why they want to destroy the first President we have had in a very long time with the vision, the goals, the objectives and the guts to actually to push things that make things better for just about everybody other than the pure freeloaders. Or why they continue to defend an administration that clearly abused power and had no vision to make things better at all.

Foxfyre said:

Sorry but I was in a business that allowed me to review many hundreds of business financials--P&Ls, payroll, gross receipts etc.--during Obama's administration. And I can assure you there was no economic stability. The economy and what it did to people was pathetic under the Obama Administration. More people not working. Far too many people who were working having to do so with reduced hours or multiple part time jobs due to the horrendous taxes disguised as healthcare reform during the Obama administration. Unemployment among black people and Hispanics was stagnant or skyrocketed under Obama. It was coming down the last few years mostly because so many had dropped out of the work force entirely. Household incomes and net worth declined under Obama. Few business start ups and a lot of business closings under Obama.

Unemployment continues to drop under President Trump not because people are dropping out of the work force as was mostly the case under Obama, but because people are going back to work. Unemployment among black people and Hispanics is at the lowest point in U.S. history even though more black people and Hispanics are now working. There are jobs again for many more people who want them. There were 123 million folks in the work force in January 2017 and 126 million in the work force in December 2017. And with corporations bringing their operations and capital back home, it shouldn't be long before anybody who wants a good paying, permanent full time job can get one.

For the life of me, I can't understand why dogmatic leftists are so unwilling to acknowledge and appreciate and feel good about good economic news.

But then I can't understand why they want to destroy the first President we have had in a very long time with the vision, the goals, the objectives and the guts to actually to push things that make things better for just about everybody other than the pure freeloaders. Or why they continue to defend an administration that clearly abused power and had no vision to make things better at all.

Click to expand...

Sure, there is very little real difference in the economy, today, as 2 years ago.

Yarddog said:

Sure, there is very little real difference in the economy, today, as 2 years ago.

Click to expand...

You won't convince me or my friends and neighbors who are now going back to work in good paying, full time permanent jobs who were unable to get those jobs the last years of the Obama administration.

Foxfyre said:

You won't convince me or my friends and neighbors who are now going back to work in good paying, full time permanent jobs who were unable to get those jobs the last years of the Obama administration.

Click to expand...

No one can convince those who are closed minded to reality. Most of the jobs created in the last year are exactly like the jobs created over the past 8 years. Low paying.

Hopefully that will change over the next few years but time will tell.

Root of Jesse said:

So...you're forced to pay for coverage that's non-existent. You pay for the privilege of buying insurance, don't get much for the $$$ you pay, then when you need it you pay a huge deductible. Sounds like it was better before.

Click to expand...

Ya mean back in the days when you’d file a claim after years of contiguous coverage, the insurance company would then investigate the original application and discover you forgot to mention you took a medication for acne back in your teen years, and use that omission as a cause to rescind the policy completely?

Or write you a policy with a lifetime cap that barely covered a day in the hospital?

Or write policies specifically excluding anything that actually ailed you?

The ACA didn’t just come out of nowhere and muck up a great system. It was those types of abuses in addition to the number uninsured that has made healthcare reform a priority for well over five decades. Heck - teddy Roosevelt was one of the first to argue for a national health plan lol

a huge percent of the population isn’t covered simply because they don’t have the disposable income to pay the exorbitant cost of insurance nowadays.

Root of Jesse said:

Not trying to say there weren't or aren't problems with the insurance industry. Just saying that Obama's way to solve it didn't solve it, and I think it's really on purpose.

People usually go uninsured for a reason. They're young, healthy and don't need a regular insurance to do things like go for checkups and health exams; or they can't afford it because of a pre-existing condition (I know, I was one of those at one time. Funny, though, I found the exact policy from the exact HCP at the exact rate through another means), or something. What should be recommended/required is catastrophic care insurance-for surgeries or whatever. People could pay a Primary Care Physician for annual checkups on their own.

Click to expand...

Agreed on a good percentage of that.

My biggest problem with the ACA is that it's a half measure - and half measures often cause more problems than they solve.

I think it's great that more people are covered - I think it's great that they have subsidies to help people afford insurance - etc. At the same time, however, it left the middle class pretty much swinging in the wind. It did nothing to curtail the exorbitant costs that plague our system relative to others (which comprises a good percentage of why insurance is so expensive - I don't blame insurance companies for everything - haha.) So it's a mixed bag.

At some point - we will move kicking and screaming to a single pay system - and we will be the better off for it. Ya know who has the best coverage of all? If you define quality of coverage by access to doctors, availability of care, etc...it's those people who are on government insurance. People on Medicaid and Medicare have far better coverage than any person I know on private insurance - with none of the headaches.

Then the question becomes "how can we afford it? Won't it be drastically more expensive to cover everyone?"

If you look at aggregate medical costs and who's currently paying it - nope. 20% of the population accounts for something like 80% of all medical expenses in this country...and by and large they're already on government insurance. The elderly consume the most as a group - and that's pretty much nearly 100% Medicare. The next largest expense comes from people having babies. As it stands more than 50% of all births are currently covered by Medicaid. When you lump everything together - it's something like 65%-70% of all medical costs are already covered by the taxpayer...so this entire discussion revolving around whether or not we ought keep Blue Cross/Humana/Aetna in business really only accounts for around 30-35% of the remaining total.

So it wouldn't be some increase in cost of multiple factors. It would be like 50% more than we're currently paying anyhow.

...and that's if you just left everything alone and didn't take advantage of things to actually cut costs...like addressing patent reform...using the power of the market to negotiate with big pharma...etc. All of which would be enabled by having a true single pay system.

Perception is an interesting thing.

*Note: I am in Australia, so how it's affected me personally is at more of a distance*

But how it's affected me personally is that it's created more work for me, pastorally. I've had pastoral conversations with people who have anxiety - to the point of extreme insomnia - over their perception of President Trump, and his personality. They fear war (nuclear war), they fear economic chaos and a growing culture of exploitation of those who are already economically vulnerable, they fear a lack of care for the environment, and they fear the way that (what they perceive as) an incompetent and unstable President might negatively affect the whole world.

And they bring all of that to me, looking for wise counsel. That's not an easy thing to respond to, because from where I'm sitting, a lot of those fears look to have some basis. So it then becomes about how we manage ourselves, how we cultivate resilience and invest in self-care and work together on positive responses, in a time of global anxiety.

So the main affect it's had on me personally is doing an awful lot of work really on basic mental health stuff, which has been triggered or exacerbated by international perception of President Trump.

Paidiske said:

Perception is an interesting thing.

*Note: I am in Australia, so how it's affected me personally is at more of a distance*

But how it's affected me personally is that it's created more work for me, pastorally. I've had pastoral conversations with people who have anxiety - to the point of extreme insomnia - over their perception of President Trump, and his personality. They fear war (nuclear war), they fear economic chaos and a growing culture of exploitation of those who are already economically vulnerable, they fear a lack of care for the environment, and they fear the way that (what they perceive as) an incompetent and unstable President might negatively affect the whole world.

And they bring all of that to me, looking for wise counsel. That's not an easy thing to respond to, because from where I'm sitting, a lot of those fears look to have some basis. So it then becomes about how we manage ourselves, how we cultivate resilience and invest in self-care and work together on positive responses, in a time of global anxiety.

So the main affect it's had on me personally is doing an awful lot of work really on basic mental health stuff, which has been triggered or exacerbated by international perception of President Trump.

Click to expand...

Well, truly that is kind of the state of things. Now, I do think the whole nuclear war thing is a bit overstated. I don't think that's going to happen - there are enough safeguards in place that I'm not too worried.

But the assessment of Trump as a man - it's pretty accurate. Basically there's a reality that the whole world sees - and then there's about 35% of the American population who due to partisan reasons refuse to see it.

Root of Jesse said:

No, they're quite different. Of course, most jobs will start by paying low. But they're not part-time jobs anymore. People were taking three-four part time jobs because employers didn't count as time employees. That's changed with the policy decisions the president has made.

Click to expand...

Well, that is incorrect. The part time job numbers peaked in 2010 with the recession and those numbers have been dropping steadily as full time jobs increased. They continued the same at through 2017 until the end of the year which saw a rise in new part time jobs. It may have been due to seasonal hiring but the numbers under Trump are no better than Obama's but show a continuation.
Hopefully, we will get a better look when the new numbers come in a an effect from the tax cuts reveals itself.

hengesthorsa said:

He has helped to push public discourse off the insane cliff it was already headed for.

It seems he has increased the chances of nuclear war somewhat.

Click to expand...

I think Trump has been a very good President. As a person he sucks with his hatred/mockery tweets. I voted for him just to keep Hillary out but he has proven to be better. Someone needs to take his tweeter phone away. Throw it in the ocean or somewhere.

Yarddog said:

No one can convince those who are closed minded to reality. Most of the jobs created in the last year are exactly like the jobs created over the past 8 years. Low paying.

Hopefully that will change over the next few years but time will tell.

Click to expand...

That is not the experience of those I personally know.

Foxfyre said:

That is not the experience of those I personally know.

Click to expand...

There may be a small percentage which have felt what you say but most who believe that things are better are feeling that euphoria from a new administration which they embrace and not from what has actually happened. At least yet.

Employment numbers are a continuation of the past 7 years. Stock Market is a continuation with a bump due to investor confidence in a tax cut. etc....

Our standing in the world has taken a huge hit due to Trump's bullying, which most all of the GOP disagrees with him on.

I am one who surely wishes that John Kasich would have gotten the nomination.