Kristen, you are doing the same exact thing that caused the problem to be ignored in the first place. The conflicker(sic) text was not an ad. It was masquerading as an addendum to a real ad. The advertiser would have had nothing to do with it, and could probably have done nothing about it.
You and others are so focussed on the rule that you failed to distinguish between an ad and a hack that members tried to tell CF Admin about.
You and others are so focussed on the rule that you failed to distinguish between an ad and a hack that members tried to tell CF Admin about.
Last edited:
Upvote
0