Extreme inflexibility comes in the arguments you use, you continue using arguments which people show you aren't valid. Changing how you present your opinion is not the same as changing that opinion entirely.
Oh, now you're mixing up evolution with atheistic Darwinist creationsm. Now you're promoting a viewpoint which is based in many many many guesses and suppositions.
You reject all of science because all of it is atheistic creationism, by your definition. For example, the creation of lightning occurs by purposeless and non-theistic processes. That makes it atheistic creationism, by your definition. Every scientific theory is atheistic creationism, according to your definition.
what i find most ironic about this thread is the failure of many to grasp how Darwinian evolution evolved into the modern theory, which is close to the "right" answer to the OP.
but then, of course, discussion derailed into tired PRATTs for the majority of the following pages...