Warden_of_the_Storm
Well-Known Member
- Oct 16, 2015
- 15,022
- 7,397
- 31
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I reinterpret the information that is given to me, until I find, as I have done there is a crack - like the presumption that mutation is first - or a need - such as the theoreticisation of preservation (within the context of more sustainable Evolution) or if I don't find these, then what needs to be exaggerated, so that I don't fall foul of my own duty before God, to go the extra mile (that is, with people that think they can describe me - what I stand for - with a theory that applies to everyone).
Partly I am to blame for not being God, and hence able to tell you what you most need to evolve, and partly you are to blame, for attempting to describe me as flesh and bone, with no provable desire to praise God - if you gave me a choice, that would be a much smaller problem, but here we are.
Then that is irrelevant to evolution because it doesn't operate on the time scale or population scale of evolution.What if I want something to be preserved for a longer amount of time, do I preserve waiting? Or do I preserve what changes through waiting?
Better to preserve, than conserve.
And what is already there, if there is an affinity: for what can be better preserved?
Purple monkeys grow on upside down car horns.
Come on now, I am being patient with you.
There is a difference between changing because you don't know what else to do, and changing because it is likely to save what is changed - you just aren't justifying a particular course of action, because.
I mean try to look beyond me, why would it matter what you interpret, unless how you interpret was at least partly affected by choice?
If every species but your own changed in response to selection pressures that affected the world, you would seriously still trust Evolution, to work out whether you should respond or not?
Why do you need to reinterpret the information?
If it cannot be reappropriated, it's not information.
I've been more than patient with you, as has everyone else that is on the threads you create.
I've said this so many times it's becoming stupid that I have to repeat it: evolution isn't something that any being has a choice about. Evolution is a natural biological force that occurs when the environment changes and forces animals to change with it. Evolution is simple just a biological reaction to environmental change.
It's not something to trust or believe in. It's not a philosophy or religion.
Yes, but you still have to demonstrate how faith in Evolution, matures.
I don't know why you don't get that?
But reappropriation isn't reinterpretation. Those are two separate things.
Do you even actually want to learn about evolution?
Because evolution isn't a faith system. It's a fact of biological science, plain and simple. I do not get why you don't get this.
I love you man, but if you keep asking me do I want to learn, when you give me no choice to learn: I am going to have to be happy, in a way I have never been (happy) before.
I think the truth is I want to take advantage of Evolution, in doing good works, for God.
If there is no expediency in Evolution, once I know how I want to serve God, you and I are both wasting our time discussing it.
There is more at stake than "what Evolution is".
Are people guided by what they believe?, that is what is at stake.
You need an answer, if you haven't thought of it already - which is why I am here?
Yes, and evolution doesn't answer that question, and it never will. Evolution is simply how life changes as a result of environmental pressures and changes.
If you want the question "why am I here?" answered, then you need to look to philosophy, not biological science.
It's not "why am I here?" I want an answer to, but "why is Evolution here?".
I mean you really give me no choice, I give you the ten commandments, but you give me no choice. Ten nothing?
If that's a threat than it is honestly the single weirdest threat I've ever seen.
I keep asking because I've not seen you show an actual intent to learn about evolution because you keep asking these asinine and nonsensical questions.
Explain what you mean by 'take advantage of evolution, in doing good works, for God'.
And why do you want expediency in evolution? What do you hope to get from evolution being convenient?
There is nothing asinine about preservation.
If you can't preserve anything, you die.
But you’re using the word preserved when you should use the word conserve.Preserved means "despite change", so you have not understood what I said.
You have never made sense. I suspect this will not change. Good day.Better to preserve, than conserve.
And what is already there, if there is an affinity: for what can be better preserved?
Evolution is here because life is here. Evolution is life changing in reaction to the environment's changing. That's all it is.
Why is this hard for you to grasp?
More nonsense again.
But you’re using the word preserved when you should use the word conserve.
Did you not know that?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?