what evolutionism does ot society

[Dal M.]

I could say that this is a clear example of the "post hoc ergo propter hoc" fallacy. I could ask whether the validity of a scientific theory is determined by how good it is for society. Or I could go straight for the mockery. Hmm... decisions, decisions...

NUMBER OF MASSIVE BONG HITS FRED WILLIAMS HAS TAKEN DURING THE PAST WORK WEEK

You'll note his Mary Jane consumption sharply decreases as we reach Wednesday, only to rebound dramatically as the weekend approaches.

 

[notto]

I think that 1963 can also be pointed to to a year where the civil rights of minorities started to increase and the number of lynchings and crimes of discrimination began to decrease. Thank You Evolution!!!

 

[Lord Emsworth]

It was in 1960 that "The Genesis Flood" was published.

 

[Herman Hedning]

Man, I would have loved to have been able to swing through trees too - just like chimps.

Sure, that'd be fun. Just note that chimps don't have tails, so they are probably also a little miffed with evolution.

 

[f U z ! o N]

notice it says Kent Hovind on some of the slides ROFL. sorry, its not evolution that has corrupted society its man's sinful nature. this is a really funny thread LOL.

 

[AnEmpiricalAgnostic]

Don’t forget about all the stars that have exploded since the EAC’s inception of Evilutionism! If you don’t want to believe in god at least think of the poor stars!

 

[Tomk80]

Basically the OP of this thread misses one basic thing that can be summed up in 5 words:
correlation does not mean causation.

Move on folks. Nothing to see here.

 

[Pete Harcoff]

The followeing is extreamly depressing.

It is depressing. Depressing that someone could so easily misuse statistics.

And creationists, if you wonder why nobody takes you seriously, it's because of threads like this.

 

[Mystman]

I rep'ed the OP for his great parody, but my points aren't showing up..

it was a parody, right?!

 

[Tomk80]

I rep'ed the OP for his great parody, but my points aren't showing up..

it was a parody, right?!

Nope, it wasn't. DGE Project is a real, genuine YEC with a fetish for a guy named Fred Williams. Fred Williams has a site that you can find here.

 

[Lord Emsworth]

This is my last warning to the participants here

Else what?

 

[the_cheat]

Else what?

We'll all be bodily assumed into Hell, I suppose.

 

[Mystman]

Nope, it wasn't. DGE Project is a real, genuine YEC with a fetish for a guy named Fred Williams. Fred Williams has a site that you can find here.

Oh God.

 

[PhantomLlama]

Some creationists say that we shall be damned to hell for our insolence. Threads like this make me ask the question: Has this already happened?

 

[Phylogeny]

Hm...evidently, all biologists are amoral atheists since we've been using evolution as the foundation of modern biology for the last hundred years or so. May also want to show this to the western European countries so they know how horribly violent their society is as compared to ours since we have our religion to combat the evils of evolution and most of them are already evolutionist, baby eating atheists.

Seriously, you should have learned this in high school:

correlation does not mean causation
if you made these types of assumptions in my genetics class, you would so fail the exams.

 

[Tomk80]

Oh God.

I'm sorry you had to see that.

 

[random_guy]

This thread got me wondering, what happens if something like this did get posted in the quiet thread. Are there measures to take it down? Would it seem like the evolutionists are silencing the Creationists? Or do we leave it up in the view of fairness that liberals should have?

 

[MSBS]

This thread got me wondering, what happens if something like this did get posted in the quiet thread. Are there measures to take it down? Would it seem like the evolutionists are silencing the Creationists? Or do we leave it up in the view of fairness that liberals should have?

Why do you assume that anyone that thinks this is bunk is a liberal?

 

[random_guy]

No, I'm just using liberal like that other thread, Liberal Hypocrisy Against Teaching Creationism in Public Schools. The OP implied that the liberal community should allow all views, including junk like Creationism, in schools if they were truly liberal.

 

[nvxplorer]

No, I'm just using liberal like that other thread, Liberal Hypocrisy Against Teaching Creationism in Public Schools. The OP implied that the liberal community should allow all views, including junk like Creationism, in schools if they were truly liberal.

I'm not sure what passes for liberalism these days, as those who identify on either side appear to be extremists to me, but since when was liberalism defined as "allowing all views?" That is absurd on its face because we would have liberalism espousing conservative views, which is a contradiction.