Originally posted by Lanakila
But, because science is studied by scientists who primarily have a belief that evolution (macro and micro happened) and look at the evidence with that belief in mind, often the interpretation of the very same data is skewed toward that evolutionary belief. You can call it bias, or propaganda if you like, but this is in fact the truth.
No Lanakila, that is not the truth. Are you aware that the science of evolution hasn't always existed? That the people who developed the contents of evolutionary theory did not have a prior assumption that it was true. It took almost eighty years of research to go from Darwins' inital concepts to the modern synthesis. That process of scientific refinement reveals that evolution was not simply taken as a given. Your statement completely ignores the facts of the history of biology.
I admit I have a bias, or presupposition more correctly. Most evolutionists don't admit this and can't see how that presupposition causes the interpretation of the same evidence to be different than mine.
That sounds a lot like you can't imagine someone without bias or presuppositions.
Upvote
0