What else do you believe? (Creationists only please)

What else to you believe? (Creationists only please)

  • Global warming / climate change is not happening or is a hoax.

  • Vaccinations are dangerous and should not be used.

  • The Earth is flat like a disc.

  • The Holocaust did not happen.

  • Members of the government (or other influencial people) are aliens.

  • The American Government was secretly behind 9/11.

  • None of the above.


Results are only viewable after voting.

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

You'll need to be more specific, and provide sources for your claims in order to get out of the category that you are attempting to discredit.

You seem solidly IN the category of people who will believe things without any facts to back them up. As you claim religious people to be.

"It turns out that nearly 50 percent of scientists identify with a religious label, and nearly one in five is actively involved in a house of worship, attending services more than once a month."
Elaine Howard Ecklund, Ph.D.: What Scientists Think About Religion

"The first study of physician religious beliefs has found that 76 percent of doctors believe in God and 59 percent believe in some sort of afterlife. The survey, performed by researchers at the University and published in the July issue of the Journal of General Internal Medicine, found that 90 percent of doctors in the United States attend religious services at least occasionally, compared to 81 percent of all adults. Fifty-five percent of doctors say their religious beliefs influence how they practice medicine. "
Survey on physicians’ religious beliefs shows majority faithful

Note that physicians attend services MORE than the general public.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Their creation story is called evolution. It all created itself with no intelligence involved. It just sort of happened all by itself.

Right. I was referring more to the big blamo! theory.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Only if you think doctors, lawyer, and scientists are misguided. They all attend church services and believe in God.

Physicians attend church more than the general population does.

[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]"It takes many years of education and training to become a physician. Typically, three to four years of undergraduate school and four years of medical school are required."

[/FONT]
MEDICAL SCHOOL CURRICULUM:
(Undergraduate Medical Education)

The Colleges

First Year: Overview
Anatomy
Biochemistry
Cell Biology
Embryology
Genetics
Human Behavior
Immunology
Neuroscience
Physiology

Second Year: Overview
Clinical Medicine & Microbiology
Pathology & Pharmacology

Pre-clinical Electives Program

Third Year: Overview
Family Medicine, Internal Medicine & Neurology
Ob-Gyn & Pediatrics
Psychiatry & Surgery

Fourth Year: Overview
Acute Care & Ambulatory Care
Medicine Subinternship & ACLS
Electives

[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
[/FONT]
I don't see the religion / ignorance connection at all.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

And more. I read that the "sudden" miracles in the scriptures all have the description of being "old". Lame men walking, blind men seeing, water turning to wine....all seem to be quick & yet complete. All have the characteristics of things that took a lot of time.

So may well be the Creation Week. Fully finished in 7 days, but with all the characteristics of something that took much longer. When the blind man was healed......"when" did the healing take place? Seemingly not in OUR reality.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

I don't mind. Creationists should always have some sort of support for our beliefs. The scriptures hold an ocean of wisdom whereas science doesn't even claim to have a drip of wisdom.
 
Upvote 0

selfinflikted

Under Deck
Jul 13, 2006
11,441
786
44
✟24,014.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
I don't mind. Creationists should always have some sort of support for our beliefs. The scriptures hold an ocean of wisdom whereas science doesn't even claim to have a drip of wisdom.

The Bible has a lot of *ahem* morally questionable content, and yet there is wisdom to be found there. But, there Bible is not a science text. Science simply seeks to explain the world around us, and it does it quite well.

Where science and the Bible* do not agree, do you intentionally overlook the facts in favor of what the Bible says?

*Or, at least what people think the Bible says.
 
Upvote 0

Lion Hearted Man

Eternal Newbie
Dec 11, 2010
2,805
107
Visit site
✟11,179.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged

You missed this part:

Oh and...

Looks like doctors are often religious, but they're not necessarily your religion.

As a medical student, I can tell you that any given medical student class is very diverse. But there are a lot of students from varying ethnicities and cultures. From this article, it's clear to me that doctors are more mature about their religion, and treat it more like a cultural thing rather than a "God guide my scalpel" sort of thing.

Judging by my interactions with fellow students in my school, I anticipate that the number of atheist doctors is going to increase, mirroring the increase in of atheists in the general population in the US.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The Bible has a lot of *ahem* morally questionable content,

That's because the Bible is an accurate historical document of past events.


The Scientific Method has no procedures to confirm or verify historical events. It is founded on reproducible testing.

I do give more weight to the Bible because I've discovered it to be historically accurate. There are even a few experiments spelled out that can be recreated.

Science has no effect on historical documents or past events.
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
How does one attack words in a book? ....
Logic is obviously not one of your strong points.

You seem unfamiliar with:

CRITICAL ANALYSIS

Critical analysis


What is critical analysis?

Critical analysis is a central process in all academic work. It involves thinking critically, which is applying rational and logical thinking while deconstructing the texts you read...


What Is Critical Reading?
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

Truth, Reality, and Facts, are not tied to popular opinion in any way.
You might just agree with me after reading:



(CBS) Most Americans do not accept the theory of evolution. Instead, 51 percent of Americans say God created humans in their present form, and another three in 10 say that while humans evolved, God guided the process. Just 15 percent say humans evolved, and that God was not involved.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I will help the OP with what she is really after:

Global Warming is a hoax...

I take issue with both sides of the Global Warming issue.
If the global temps are not in a state of flux, it's only by God's grace on humanity:

The d18O records confirm that large and rapid temperature
oscillations have occurred through most of the last 110,000
year period. They are of a scale that has not been
experienced
during the past 10,000 years in which
human society mainly developed. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/icecore/greenland/summit/document/finalrpt/gripfinl.txt
.....suggesting that something changed about 10,000 years ago.
 
Upvote 0

HELENz

Love is the meaning to the world
Jun 4, 2007
892
51
Canton, Ohio
✟8,991.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Five comments. Only five. Then I bow out.

WARNING: [sarcasm (partly)]

1. Stupid is as stupid does.
2. Common sense isn't so common.

Evolution is a religion and should not be taught in schools (Neither should Creationism).
3. Evolution is not a religion. It's a scientific theory. Evolution has a mound of actual evidence behind it; Creationism, and Christianity for that matter, have a load of circumstantial evidence. And also, I agree, Creationism shouldn't be taught. Evolution should.
4. Before you say, evolution is "just" a theory, may I remind you that plate tectonics and gravity are also "just" theories. Also, theories in the common usage would be more referred to as hypotheses in the scientific community; a theory is something that has been tested and has evidence behind it. Still don't get it, look it up!

5. Well, Americans are rather stupid. And our education system sucks. This says nothing.



[/sarcasm]
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
3. Evolution is not a religion.

Mostly not. But it is used in a religious way as a foundation for exploring the past. The Scientific Method doesn't allow any explorations into the past. Anybody who does that is on a religious foundation and not a scientific one.



Science can't cover the Origins of Species. It's outside of it's box limiting it to reproducible experiments.

5. Well, Americans are rather stupid. And our education system sucks. This says nothing.
You said nothing.
Our higher education system is the envy of the world.
"The USA has the world’s largest international student population"
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Really not even stars? we are after all seeing the past when we look up into the sky.

Stars are no different than any observed event.
Science can only make predictions about future observations based on past ones.
It makes no predictions about past observations. It cannot see into the past. Only the future.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums