Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes, there absolutely 100% is scriptural support to be guided by prophets.
I invite you for a third time to directly answer my question, which directly relates to answering yours. In the mean time acts 11 is one such example.I invite you a third time to please show it in the NT (what we are addressing). 100%, to me, means it is clearly demonstrated in two or more places. I can not find even one.
I invite you for a third time to directly answer my question, which directly relates to answering yours. In the mean time acts 11 is one such example.
Right, and would they have prepared aid without the word? No.If a prophet is operating in his/her gifting - they are speaking God's heart - something the person already knows.
Acts 11
I assume you are referring to:
And in these days prophets came from Jerusalem to Antioch. 28 Then one of them, named Agabus, stood up and showed by the Spirit that there was going to be a great famine throughout all the world, which also happened in the days of Claudius Caesar. 29 Then the disciples, each according to his ability, determined to send relief to the brethren dwelling in JudeaThat was certainly the Word of knowledge in demonstration.
Sometimes, but not always... in fact that is not possible when prophesying to unbelieversIf a prophet is operating in his/her gifting - they are speaking God's heart - something the person already knows
Right, and would they have prepared aid without the word? No.
This is going nowhere. You still have not directly answered my question, which directly effects this. There are more scriptures, but until I understand where you stand on something as basic as is a Prophet speaking the words of the Holy Spirit or not it's kinda pointless.We have gone from suffering for Christ to giving an offering. Ok. Let’s say that is one
You said 100%
For me personally, I need more than one verse to believe something 100%.
Sometimes, but not always... in fact that is not possible when prophesying to unbelievers
That is the gift of prophecy not the office of prophet. Exactly as I said: too narrow of a viewprophesying to unbelievers??
Paul said: 1 Cor 14:22 Therefore tongues are for a sign, not to those who believe but to unbelievers; but prophesying is not for unbelievers but for those who believe.
That is the gift of prophecy not the office of prophet. Exactly as I said: too narrow of a view
I'm not trying to be facetious or evasive but while I can spend a lot of time going through it and spelling it all out for you, you should read the Book of Acts for yourself...very slowly. You'd be surprised how much is missed by rushing through and just catching the major emphasis made by the current church doctrines. I think everything written is important, no matter how minor many in the church make it. God does not include anything for no reason.can you cite chapter and verse please.
I did answer your statement -
No - there is zero - no instruction that Believers are to be led by Prophets.
That teaching is not supported by scripture
Regarding Agabus: confirmation is guidance.
I'm not trying to be facetious or evasive but while I can spend a lot of time going through it and spelling it all out for you, you should read the Book of Acts for yourself...very slowly. You'd be surprised how much is missed by rushing through and just catching the major emphasis made by the current church doctrines. I think everything written is important, no matter how minor many in the church make it. God does not include anything for no reason.
Regarding Agabus: confirmation is guidance.
You are claiming knowledge of the thoughts of Paul and how his thoughts were impacted by the words of a Prophet.Agabus confirmed he was about to suffer, that is not guidance.
You are claiming knowledge of the thoughts of Paul and how his thoughts were impacted by the words of a Prophet.
Your source is?
You are assuming that is “revelatory knowledge”, when it could very well be a reference to “experiential knowledge”.Acts 9:16 For I will show him how many things he must suffer for My name’s sake.”
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?