IT was, in fact, COMMANDED in certain rare instances.
Aside: it is not condemned in the NT either.
Here is a quote from a really good article that condemns polygamy:
“I see at least a few indications here that Jesus was siding with the anti-polygamists of His day:
1. He cites
Genesis 1:27 with
Genesis 2:24 (
Matthew 19:4-5), a common anti-polygamist combination of scripture.
2. He quotes the anti-polygamist paraphrase of
Genesis 2:24 (
Matthew 19:5), not the original Hebrew, which has a history of use by anti-polygamists.
3. He emphasizes the word "two" by mentioning it again in
Matthew 19:6.
4. He uses the phrase "from the beginning" (
Matthew 19:8), which is known to have been used in anti-polygamist argumentation.
It should be noted that Paul also repeatedly uses the anti-polygamist rendering of
Genesis 2:24 (
1 Corinthians 6:16,
Ephesians 5:31).
Ephesians 5 is inherently anti-polygamist. Paul tells us that there's only one Christ and only one church (
Ephesians 4:4-5), then he makes that relationship the model for the marriage relationship. He also uses the head/body imagery (
Ephesians 5:23), and there can be only one head and one body. Paul goes on to cite
Genesis 2:24 (
Ephesians 5:31). I think that the most natural way to read
Ephesians 5 is as a New Testament expansion of
Genesis 2. In other words,
Ephesians 5 is about the nature of all marriage, not just some marriages (monogamous marriages). To argue that
Ephesians 5 doesn't apply to polygamists would be like arguing that
Genesis 2 doesn't either. If polygamists aren't going to get their model for marriage from
Genesis 2 or
Ephesians 5, then where are they going to get it?
Romans 7:3 seems to be contrary to polygamy as well. Douglas Moo writes:
"he [Paul] certainly uses the word ['law'] in 6:14, 15 and in most of chap. 7 with reference to the Mosaic law...It is almost certain, then, that Paul here refers to the Mosaic law...Since Paul does not mention divorce, we can assume that the remarriage of the woman has taken place without a divorce of any kind; and any such remarriage is, of course, adulterous. Further, any body of law that Paul may be citing - Roman or OT (cf.
Deut. 25:1-4) - allows for remarriage on grounds other than the death of the spouse." (The Epistle To The Romans [Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 1996], pp. 411-412, n. 24 on p. 413)
Some of the most explicit passages that can be cited against polygamy are from the Old Testament, such as
Genesis 2 and
Proverbs 5. In
Proverbs 5, we aren't told to be satisfied with our wife
if she's all God allows us to have. It isn't suggested that we could seek other women if we want to. Rather, we're told to be satisfied with her throughout our life. Solomon's answer to sexual temptation is monogamy with the wife of your youth, not polygamy. Bruce Waltke cites
Proverbs 5 as an illustration of
1 Corinthians 7:4-5 and writes that "Marriage is here thought of as strongly monogamous." (The Book Of Proverbs: Chapters 1-15 [Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 2004], pp. 317, 321)
Proverbs 5:17 refers to your wife being yours
alone, which can only be monogamy, and the wife is referred to as satisfying the husband's sexual thirst, which is, again, monogamy. The woman is to meet the man's sexual desires "at all times" and "always" (
Proverbs 5:19), which, again, can only be monogamy. Solomon is referring to sexual relations, so he can't be saying that a husband is to be always satisfied with his first wife, even as he's having sex with his second, third, and fourth wives. Similarly, Solomon writes in
Ecclesiastes 9:9about how one wife is the reward a man is given, as if he should be satisfied with her alone.
I think there are plausible alternative interpretations to the Old Testament passages people often cite in support of polygamy. See, for example, Walter Kaiser's comments in Toward Old Testament Ethics (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 1991). However, even if we were to conclude that polygamy was allowed in Old Testament times, the evidence against it in the New Testament era doesn't allow us to consider polygamy acceptable today.”
Article Source:
Triablogue: Polygamy Is Condemned By Scripture