Sure he is and quotes Thou shalt not covet a part of the stone tablets in 7:7 all in the same verse. He made no distinction from the stone tablets.
Upvote
0
Sure he is and quotes Thou shalt not covet a part of the stone tablets in 7:7 all in the same verse. He made no distinction from the stone tablets.So if Paul is talking about the ten commandments in chapter 7, which I believe he is, then Paul declares that he serves the law of God.
I'm sorry but "at the cross" doesn't cut it since the bible doesn't say that anywhere. And hat "light switch" theology are you talking about?
You're absolutely right. God gave laws regarding diet, and I try my best to uphold them. I'm not pulling away from anything, nor am I ashamed of it.
The bible says otherwise.
Blessed are they that do his commandments, that they may have right to the tree of life, and may enter in through the gates into the city.
Now I'm no english major, but I do say that this text proclaims that those who have a right to the tree of life, and who enter into the city, are those who do the commandments of God.
So if Paul is talking about the ten commandments in chapter 7, which I believe he is, then Paul declares that he serves the law of God.
Please tell us why Jesus kept the law.I do. Why don't you?
It's been explained to you.
This is what I mean by you believing what you want. TruthWave and Lyscimacus both explained what was meant when he used the word "code". An SDA (me) is telling you there is no code.
OK please note your underlined fulfilled in us. The word in is used but I think you read by.He gave it to Jesus so that we had permission to willfully violate His commandments? Or He gave to Jesus the full responsibility and weight of the curse of the law? Jesus bore our sins, so that we might have victory and be saved.
Notice:
Romans 8:3 For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:
8:4 That the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
Galatians 6:2 - "Bear ye one another's burdens, and so fulfil the law of Christ."
God expects to have a remnant people who will EXEMPLIFY His character! This is what it means to be a Christian. Or else, we're better off being atheists.
We are weak, and we fail. But Christ fulfilled where the law was weak. But we are to do our part of what we CAN do. If we WILLFULLY go against what we CAN do, this is called "transgression of the law", and we cannot be saved. This is rebellion, not submission to Christ.
I do. Why don't you?
It's been explained to you.
This is what I mean by you believing what you want. TruthWave and Lyscimacus both explained what was meant when he used the word "code". An SDA (me) is telling you there is no code.
Now I wish to deal only with the above statement of your post and have deleted the rest of it for that reason.He gave it to Jesus so that we had permission to willfully violate His commandments? Or He gave to Jesus the full responsibility and weight of the curse of the law? Jesus bore our sins, so that we might have victory and be saved.
why did paul say, dying to what BOUND US, IN 7;6.
LOL..NOT VERY FLATTERING.
Only a legalist would say such a thing. It appears t me that you simply can't follow the narrative through the Bible.
So why do you appeal to science and other sources?
The code is a problem to understanding.
Again only a legalist could say that.
WHOAAAAA...What do u mean "the cross does notcut it"?
please advise, and just for the record, my buddy ricardo, it still stands that if one delcares other unrighteous by food law violations, then we must presume those who keep food laws, must think they are????
Please tell us why Jesus kept the law.
What has been explained. All I saw was a don't take me serious kinda retraction. I've illustrated the code with some examples. I have more. Want them?
What did Lyscimacus take ownership of in his post?
There can be no end to this thread . There is already a thread declares that it will be the end to this topic .This thread is running as long as this other one, with still no end in sight
http://www.christianforums.com/t7465159/
Peter and the Keys, Catholicism and the Pope (6)
.
Do you mean all mankind?Because He was suppose to, just like any other man.
The incription isn't like a code such as a scrambled word or substituted symbols. The incription is in the defining of the word or phrase as I've pointed out.Yes, please post these cryptic messages that were being posted that left you with no detailed explanation.
Even Biblical truth is code for SDA doctrine. Look you can deny all you wish. It is fine with me. But you don't wish to communicate IMO. You wish me to read from to as on. You wish for me to read in as by. I can give more code it you like.Couple pages back. I think it's interesting that you can ask this question. Gives me the feeling you haven't been actually seeking an explanation, because it's there. I do believe TruthWave responded to you in regards to the "code" being "biblical truth", which you in turn responded to with a "Are you serious" type of response.
You need to give me a quote or post either by number or short cut (preferred) for me to understand what you're talking about.Couple pages back. I think it's interesting that you can ask this question. Gives me the feeling you haven't been actually seeking an explanation, because it's there. I do believe TruthWave responded to you in regards to the "code" being "biblical truth", which you in turn responded to with a "Are you serious" type of response.
if it ends someone will start another thread that trumpets how we "need" to keep the LawThere can be no end to this thread . There is already a thread declares that it will be the end to this topic .
It won't stop those making such threads from just starting new ones over and over posting their doctrine without anyone refuting it and bumping it daily so it appears on the new threads list.Has anyone tried a boycott of sabbath threads yet? If we don't participate then it would most likely die.
Doesn't say the law dies. It says we die. Not the law. When that old man, that old self is "dead", you are no longer living in the flesh, but in the spirit. Therefore, the law has no condemning power over you. Why? Because you are dead to the law, not violating it. You can only break a law when you are alive to it. You can only keep the law when you're dead to it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?