Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The Earth is 100 million years old.
The Earth is 500 million years old.
The Earth is 2 billion years old.
Neanderthal Man is the missing link.
Nebraska Man is the missing link.
Java Man is the missing link.
Piltdown Man is the missing link.
Cro-Magnon Man is the missing link.
The evolution of the horse.
Dinosaurs were cold-blooded.
Dinosaurs were slow and clumsy.
The Coelacanth fish is the ancestor of an amphibian.
Archaeopteryx is the link between reptiles and birds.
[SIZE=-0][SIZE=-0]A list of all the things evolutionists believe which can be shown to be true. For example,
Natural selection causes small variations in species.
Oh! and don't forget Lucy.
[/SIZE][/SIZE]
top 5? lets see hereI have several debates going with Creationists in my personal life on moral and scientific levels. I am good with the moral issues, but we butt heads quite a bit on science levels. Neither of us are scientists ourselves, so we must rely on evidence of the scientific camps we subscribe to. I remind my opponents that if I personally am not equipped with the information to refute their Creationist claims, it doesn't validate their point. It merely means I am not an expert in the field.
So...for the experts, what are your Top 5 scientific proofs that creationists cannot dispute? A link to some information regarding it would be helpful too.
This will be educational for myself as well as my debate partners.
Thanks.
Wonderful. But, although you're right in saying there's no such thing as empirical proof, there is such thing as empirical evidence. And all such evidence points to evolution.
He's telling you your beliefs are unreasonable. If you have a problem that, you should be showing how they are reasonable, instead of complaining that, on a debate forum, someone has started debating.
If I firmly proclaimed that the moon was made out of green cheese, would you correct me or just say "Well, you are allowed to have your own belief system." ?
I'm simply pointing out the arrogance of someone claiming my beliefs are wrong for me.
There is a possibility of engineering, but it is not probable at this time. There is almost no scientific evidence for it.Only if you first reject the possibility of engineering.
There is a possibility of engineering, but it is not probable at this time. There is almost no scientific evidence for it.
Only if you first reject the possibility of engineering.
There have been many things science has thought not probable, which was later determined to be true.
Those later determinations were based on evidence, of which you have supplied zero. This is the exact opposite with evolution which is based on evidence, mountains of it.
You're just playing a semantics game. The point of the OP was pretty clear.That's right.
OP: "So...for the experts, what are your Top 5 scientific proofs that creationists cannot dispute?"
Wow. Thanks dude.Your lack of any scientific knowledge is pitiful to say the least. You are in no position to judge science.
Creationism is totally ANTI SCIENCE and the proof that creationism is hogwash is the very fact that we are using the internet right now!
But the evolutionist's evidence is only evidence of possibility, not of fact.
But I have not stated it is right or wrong.
I have stated that, for me, the evidence is inadequate.
There have been many things science has thought not probable, which was later determined to be true.
Exactly.But the evolutionist's evidence is only evidence of possibility, not of fact.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?