• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

what are the differences between certain denominations?

FaithfulPilgrim

Eternally Seeking
Feb 8, 2015
455
121
South Carolina
✟54,849.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
As with you, ghag17, I was raised primarily in Baptist churches, although for a period my family did attend a Nazarene church. I couldn't tell you what the Nazarene faith is all about, because I was young when we went there. I do know their are multiple different branches of the Baptist faith; Southern Baptist, Free Will Baptist, Full Gospel Baptist, Holiness Baptist, etc. Same with Pentecostals, you have a Pentecostals and Oneness Pentecostals. Again, I couldn't tell you anything that couldn't be easily researched, although every church varies in opinion and belief.

I was raised Baptist, and always been one, but I do have connections to the Nazarene Church as one of my great grandparents was a Nazarene, but they're not extinct in my family. I also attended VBS at a Nazarene church as a kid.

There is a small portion of Pentecostals in my family, as well. I attended their church once, but I didn't hear of the "tongues" being spoken and everyone stayed put in their pews. They told me they believed it, I just didn't notice it, if it happened, in that service.

The only denominations I have some I have any familiarity with aside from the SBC are the Free Will Baptists and the SDA since I use to attend some of those churches.

The former is because my stepdad is a Free Will Baptist and his brother was the pastor. We left for personal family reasons.

For the latter, I once attended a private school affiliated with an SDA church and my peers pressured me to go. I mainly went just to spend some time with my friends outside of school.

The SDA is often accused as being a cult, but they are more doctrinally sound than most cults. You just have to watch out for their exclusivism and legalism.

Supposedly, they don't believe in hell, but the ones I worshiped with and the one at the school believed in hell.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FaithfulPilgrim

Eternally Seeking
Feb 8, 2015
455
121
South Carolina
✟54,849.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
Of course. I was mainly saying that the words chosen might have been a little strong. I'm sure we both know the history and that there is a difference between Baptists and Anabaptists.

Well, they aren't related to each other in a connection sense since the Anabaptists arose in Central Europe (Switzerland, I believe) and the Baptists arose in England and broke away from the Anglican Church and Holland played a role in the development of the Baptists. In away, we're more related to the Anglicans in that the Baptists came out of that tradition. I guess you could say they are family that disagreed with each other while Anabaptists and Baptists are friends who have similar views.

However, they have influenced each other. John Smyth, the founder of the Baptists, did spend the last few years of his life living with the Mennonites and the Baptists were certainly influenced by them.

Some Baptists are certainly pretty similar to Anabaptists, while other seem closer to Puritans or Congregationalists.

Since Anglicanism is the via media between Protestantism and Catholicism, I guess Baptists are a via media between Protestantism and Anabaptism.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Well, they aren't related to each other in a connection sense since the Anabaptists arose in Central Europe (Switzerland, I believe) and the Baptists arose in England and broke away from the Anglican Church and Holland played a role in the development of the Baptists.
The latter part of that is important. While the continental Anabaptists didn't proselytize among the English, John Smyth certainly did live and study among them and then return to England to start up congregations on the model of the Christians he'd lived among in Europe. Most people would call that a connection.

In away, we're more related to the Anglicans in that the Baptists came out of that tradition.
They didn't really "come out of that tradition," though. They came out of that country (England), you might say, but the similarities between the Baptists and the Anglicans in either belief or practice are few and, as you know, the Anabaptist ways and attitudes didn't go over well with the Englishmen Smyth hoped would come to his side.

Since Anglicanism is the via media between Protestantism and Catholicism, I guess Baptists are a via media between Protestantism and Anabaptism.
I, like most people, consider them all to be Protestants. Different from each other to the point of being just about at the opposite ends of the Protestant spectrum, but Protestant nonetheless.
 
Upvote 0

Spirit of Pentecost

Acts 2:38 Salvation
May 6, 2016
263
101
Georgia
✟46,567.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
I was raised Baptist, and always been one, but I do have connections to the Nazarene Church as one of my great grandparents was a Nazarene, but they're not extinct in my family. I also attended VBS at a Nazarene church as a kid.

There is a small portion of Pentecostals in my family, as well. I attended their church once, but I didn't hear of the "tongues" being spoken and everyone stayed put in their pews. They told me they believed it, I just didn't notice it, if it happened, in that service.

The only denominations I have some I have any familiarity with aside from the SBC are the Free Will Baptists and the SDA since I use to attend some of those churches.

The former is because my stepdad is a Free Will Baptist and his brother was the pastor. We left for personal family reasons.

For the latter, I once attended a private school affiliated with an SDA church and my peers pressured me to go. I mainly went just to spend some time with my friends outside of school.

The SDA is often accused as being a cult, but they are more doctrinally sound than most cults. You just have to watch out for their exclusivism and legalism.

Supposedly, they don't believe in hell, but the ones I worshiped with and the one at the school believed in hell.
I have been to churches that consider themselves Pentecostal, and not once did I hear anyone speak in tongues, and they "stayed put in their pews" (just as you have said). However, that doesn't mean that these churches don't get more rowdy (for like of a better term) once the Spirit falls on their service. Even at my church, we can sometimes have "lighter" services, and then sometimes we have "full-blown" services, when everyone is up and praising Jesus, while the musicians play. Those nights, the pastor may not even get to preach.
 
Upvote 0

Meowzltov

Freylekher Yid
Aug 3, 2014
18,606
4,466
64
Southern California
✟67,237.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
i have been a christian for a long time now, raised in a baptist church, though i am not a baptist any longer. i have no idea what different denominations believe, such as evangelical, pentecostal, assembly of God, ect. i do know about baptist, catholic, lutheran, non-denominational, but that's about it.
There is no substitute for homework, which means actually going around and worshiping at many different churches, talking with their clergy, and getting out books to read. But I'll give you some general categories.

First, all Churches can be divided into three general groups: Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant (accepting the five solas). All Christians are in one of those three subgroups of history.

The five solas are:
  • Sola Fide, by faith alone.
  • Sola Scriptura, by Scripture alone.
  • Solus Christus, through Christ alone.
  • Sola Gratia, by grace alone.
  • Soli Deo Gloria, glory to God alone.
The first two solas are only accepted by Protestants, but the last three are accepted by all Christians.

There are lots of little differences between Catholics and the Orthodox, but the BIG difference is that Catholics have the Pope and the Orthodox do not.

Now for the smaller categories:

The catholic churches, known in CF as the traditional churches. These are the churches that make claims to apostolic succession. Apostolic succession is the idea that the Apostles had teaching authority which they passed on to the bishops via the laying on of hands, and so on until the bishops of today in an unbroken chain of laying on of hands. In this manner the Church has authority in addition to the Bible. These churches also tend to believe in Sacramentality, and put emphasis on Eucharist. They are highly Creedal. They worship with a Liturgical style. Examples of these traditional churches are the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Catholic Church. Most include the confessional Lutheran Churches although they are sola scriptura.

The Reform/Calvinist Churches. They believe the five solas (such as faith alone and Bible alone) as well as the five points of Calvinism (acronym TULIP):
Total Depravity
Unconditional Election
Limited Atonement (Christ died ONLY for the elect)
Irresistible Grace
Perseverance of the Saints (also known as Once Saved Always Saved)
An example of a Reform Church would be the Presbyterian Church.

The Wesleyan/Arminian Churches. They accept the solas. These are largely offshoots of the Church of England and so have remnants of Sacramentality. They are known for their beliefs opposite to the five points of Calvinism, such as the possibility that a Christian can lose their salvation. They stress good works and sanctification. Examples include the Methodist church and the Nazarene chruch.

Pentecostals/Charismatics. They accept the solas. These had their start in the Azusa Street revival of the early 20th century. They believe in the miraculous gifts of the New Testament, especially the speaking in tongues. Their worship services tend to be less organized and more spontaneous, emotional, and expressive. Examples include Assembly of God and Four Square Gospel. WARNING: there are heretical Pentecostal Churches such as the United Pentecostal Church who reject the Trinity and are therefore not considered Christians.

Anabaptist Descendants: They accept the solas. What they have in common is that they do not recognize infant baptism. Most are pacifist and emphasize good works. Examples include the Baptists, Quakers, and Amish.

Messianic Judaism -- this is hard to explain, and doesn't have a lot of unity other than that it combines the gospel with obedience to Mosaic Law. You can ask me me and I'll explain it to you if you really have a burning interest.

Miscellaneous: You will also hear the terms Evangelical and non-denominational thrown around.

Evangelical is simply a broad-based term that means an emphasis on evangelization, definition of a christian as someone who has had a personal radical conversion experience, and believing in the inerrancy of the Bible. They are sometimes called "Bible churches." Evangelicals are Protestant, and can be a denomination such as Baptist or a non-denominational church. They are often hybrids that are partially Arminian and partially Calvinist (i.e. free will but once saved always saved).

Non-denominational simply means a church that is independent church which answers only to itself (usually its pastor), rather than to a denominational headquarters. Non denominational churches are Protestant and fit into the broad categories above. Occasionally you will find a non-denominational church that just doesn't take a stand on these important issues and only embraces the solas (is Protestant) and is Evangelical.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,522
16,853
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟772,040.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The Wesleyan/Arminian Churches. They accept the solas.
Eh - not so much. Sola Scriptura is NOT accepted; rather Prima Scriptura - not scripture ALONE but scripture FIRST.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Eh - not so much. Sola Scriptura is NOT accepted; rather Prima Scriptura - not scripture ALONE but scripture FIRST.
Prima Scriptura, not a Reformation term, appears to be nothing more than a term used to correctly describe Sola Scriptura in the face of so many people misrepresenting Sola Scriptura to mean either that nothing is allowed unless there's an explicit sanction for it in Scripture or else thinking that reason and history are not to be considered at all.
 
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,522
16,853
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟772,040.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Prima Scriptura, not a Reformation term, appears to be nothing more than a term used to correctly describe Sola Scriptura in the face of so many people misrepresenting Sola Scriptura to mean either that nothing is allowed unless there's an explicit sanction for it in Scripture or else thinking that reason and history are not to be considered at all.
From a pair of UMC pastors:
United Methodists believe not in Sola Scriptura but Prima Scriptura. Our Discipline says the Bible is our primary source for our theology, not our only source.
I think the sola scriptura, literalism crowd is being earnest in their attempt to know God. The Bible is "God's Word" right? (Actually, Jesus is the Word of God; but that's for another topic). But what they are doing without their own realizing is watering it down. They think they are being 'More Christian' and 'More Biblical' by rejecting sources that aren't scripture (at one time none of the scripture was scripture! At one point Romans was just a letter from a well-known religious leader to a church.) By rejecting what Christianity has done for hundreds of years they are simplifying and watering down the Gospel.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,263
✟584,002.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
From a pair of UMC pastors:
I hear you, but the definition of Prima Scriptura that I found was nothing more than a way of saying Sola Scriptura correctly. Of course, this particular controversy doesn't concern all Protestant churches. Open Heart referred to "Wesleyan/Arminian" churches and you have cited "UMC" pastors, so that may have something to do with it.
 
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,522
16,853
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟772,040.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Open Heart referred to "Wesleyan/Arminian" churches and you have cited "UMC" pastors, so that may have something to do with it.
Indeed. The UMC is well within the Wesleyan-Arminian camp, as are other Methodists and Church of the Nazarene, Holiness churches and most old line Pentecostals.

I am familiar with Sola Scriptura as being used by the Calvinst Reform crowd. Wesleyanism (which I was raised in) does not follow that at all. Indeed, it seems like their use of Sola throws out any extrabiblical understanding or source. (which I take as an impossibility as we have to bring our own world view and logic framework to the text)
 
Upvote 0