Your self proclaimed expertise is not as impressive as you imagine. Vaccines and masks as related to covid have as many or maybe even more scientific disagreements than even climate change. I'll give just one example which I am fully aware is not a scientific study but it is a fact from personal experience. I have immediate family who had four members fully vaccinated, and faithfully wore masks and all four have had covid 3 times as opposed to myself who will never take the scarcely tested vaccine, I have yet to have it. No I am not saying covid does not exist. I had a 22 year old acquaintance who passed away from it. All I am saying is all science is not in agreement on covid or climate change.
I’m not out to impress you or anyone else with expertise.
Unlike you I’m not gullible enough to blindly follow the views of ignorant half wits like Tucker Carlson but respect the expertise of fellow scientists and follow their advice based on the scientific evidence.
Do I need to remind you are driven by conspiracy theories where actions in reducing emissions is designed to control the masses and destroy civilization as we know it, now you’re telling us it’s about science not being in agreement.
You are being disingenuous by radically moving the goalposts.
It is also absurd to support an assertion with a personal anecdote which you admit is not even a scientific study.
Instead go do a google search for peer reviewed studies on the high effectiveness of mask wearing and vaccinations.
Devastated? Hardly, I am fully aware that many believe Atlantis to be a mythical place and there are also actually some who do not. No I do not claim to be an expert on Atlantis but I am far from impressed by your self proclaimed expertise in the scientific world. It may have been a poor example but the point is valid, There have been land masses rise and fall in our historical past unrelated to the activities of man.
My faith is unshakable by anything you or those you hold in high regard in the scientific world could say. Some science of today will be proven to be wrong just as some science of yesterday WAS proven wrong. How many time do I have to say it? I have never claimed there is no change in climate! It is ever changing and has changed many times in the history of this planet. What I am against the sensationalism to frighten and fleece the public.
I am reminded of a news report from Diane Sawer from Memphis awhile ago. They had some flooding and she literally stood in the edge of the Mississippi River to give her report on how bad the flooding was and it caused outrage from the locals because of its effect on tourism. Every Hurricane is reported with the perceived tie to climate change as if my car and eating habits caused it. That is not science that is a real conspiracy theory.
I do not deny rising sea levels, I deny I cause them.
https://earth.gsfc.nasa.gov/cryo/data/current-state-sea-ice-cover
From the article:
"A satellite-based data record starting in late 1978 shows that indeed rapid changes have been occurring in the Arctic, where the ice coverage has been declining at a substantial rate. In contrast, in the Antarctic the sea ice coverage has been increasing although at a lesser rate than the decreases in the Arctic."
No save yourself some time, I am not say this article proves there is no climate change . It just show something the cult will never tell you. Some ice is decreasing and some is increasing.
A summary of these posts will do.
(1) “
Some science of today will be proven to be wrong just as some science of yesterday WAS proven wrong”.
This is the classic argumentum ad ignorantiam fallacy which can only be supported if you possess a time machine or a crystal ball.
Take a look at the second graph in
post #130, it shows an ensemble of climate models from 2004 accurately providing forecasts on temperature changes up to 2019 and hindcasts down to 1970.
Today’s models are even more accurate and run on faster supercomputers and we have the benefit of both hindsight and foresight the models are correct.
(2) What has expanding sea ice in some regions of Antarctica got to do with rising sea levels destroying the Torres Strait Islander’s environment?
Answer nothing at all as this is the classic false equivalence fallacy.
The sea ice is expanding is some regions of Antarctica due to localized weather effects such as cold winds which blows ice away from the coast allowing the water in between to freeze and the increased rate of snowfall exacerbated by climate warming.
The affects of global warming are pronounced by data obtained from the ice sheet on the continent not the sea ice and shows the ice sheet is decreasing at an average rate of 100 cubic kilometers per year.
(3) Did you even bother to look at this
reference post which refutes the notion current global warming can be explained by past global warming events?
Human activity resulting in global warming (AGW) has a unique signature,
the lower stratosphere is cooling; past global warming events not involving human activity can only warm the lower stratosphere.
What this tells us we have the means of stabilizing temperatures by reducing man made greenhouse emissions to mitigate the effects such as rising sea levels, the La Nina phases which control hurricane frequency and intensity, and extreme weather conditions involving temperatures, droughts and floods.
