• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Wendy Wright and Richard Dawkins

Strathos

No one important
Dec 11, 2012
12,663
6,532
God's Earth
✟270,796.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Who cares how old they are?

Isaiah 65:20 There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man that hath not filled his days: for the child shall die an hundred years old; but the sinner being an hundred years old shall be accursed.

What matters is how long they have been around.

What's the difference?
 
Upvote 0

Mr Strawberry

Newbie
Jan 20, 2012
4,180
81
Great Britain
✟27,542.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
You won't mind if I ignore you, will you?

Given that it's hard to name any part of the real world (that's the thing that exists outside your head) you don't have to ignore to maintain your beliefs, it would be a surprise at this stage if you chose to open your eyes.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,305
52,681
Guam
✟5,165,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What's the difference?
Everytime Mars turns another year old, Earth turns 1.88 years old, and Venus turns 3.057 years old.

Three different years-old ... same amount of time in existence.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,305
52,681
Guam
✟5,165,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Given that it's hard to name any part of the real world (that's the thing that exists outside your head) you don't have to ignore to maintain your beliefs,
You mean like an empty tomb? a literal Genesis 1? Israel as the "Promised Land"?

Do those sound familiar? or do you ignore them and hope they'll go away?

The mirror hurts, doesn't it?
 
Upvote 0

Mr Strawberry

Newbie
Jan 20, 2012
4,180
81
Great Britain
✟27,542.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
You mean like an empty tomb? a literal Genesis 1? Israel as the "Promised Land"?
You seem very confused as to which is the real world and which are stories in the Bible.

Do those sound familiar? or do you ignore them and hope they'll go away?
I'm aware of them as stories in your favourite book, yes.

The mirror hurts, doesn't it?
You haven't held up a mirror, you have held up a snapshot of the inside of your head, which seems very mixed up.
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,323
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,582.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Everytime Mars turns another year old, Earth turns 1.88 years old, and Venus turns 3.057 years old.

Three different years-old ... same amount of time in existence.

Three different measurements of "years" based on three different reference points. You like that because it's easier for you to weasel with semantics than with reality -- including the reality that the only definition of "year" that has any relevance is the one measured here on Earth... where we all currently live.
 
Upvote 0
R

rikerjoe

Guest
Everytime Mars turns another year old, Earth turns 1.88 years old, and Venus turns 3.057 years old.

Seriously? Wrong on all levels.

When Mars turns another year old, earth turns another year old too and so does Venus.


Three different years-old ... same amount of time in existence.

No, the time it takes to complete an orbit around the sun, does not impact its age! :doh:
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,305
52,681
Guam
✟5,165,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You seem very confused as to which is the real world and which are stories in the Bible.

I'm aware of them as stories in your favourite book, yes.

You haven't held up a mirror, you have held up a snapshot of the inside of your head, which seems very mixed up.
Without facts or formulas to post, you guys' true colors show; don't they?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,305
52,681
Guam
✟5,165,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Three different measurements of "years" based on three different reference points. You like that because it's easier for you to weasel with semantics than with reality -- including the reality that the only definition of "year" that has any relevance is the one measured here on Earth... where we all currently live.
Speaking of relevant years, how can anyone say the BB happened 13.7 billion years ago, when there was no earth or sun as yet?

10 billion years ago, had the earth gone around the sun 3.7 billion times?

Of course not, so ... um ... speaking of 'weaseling with semantics.'

The mirror hurts, doesn't it?
 
Upvote 0

Mr Strawberry

Newbie
Jan 20, 2012
4,180
81
Great Britain
✟27,542.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Without facts or formulas to post, you guys' true colors show; don't they?

It's not our fault if the real world comes as an unpleasant surprise to you. Blame the people responsible for keeping you in a protective bubble.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,305
52,681
Guam
✟5,165,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Seriously?
Yes, indeed -- seriously.
Wrong on all levels.
And yet I got those figures from the AV2013 Internet scientist's bible (Wikipedia). :eek:
When Mars turns another year old, earth turns another year old too and so does Venus.
And yet there are times when Mars turns another year old, yet Earth turns another two years old ... same for Venus.
No, the time it takes to complete an orbit around the sun, does not impact its age! :doh:
Which is my point, chief.

Three different ages (impacted or otherwise), same amount of time in existence.
 
Upvote 0

Lucy Stulz

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2013
1,394
57
✟1,937.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Everytime Mars turns another year old, Earth turns 1.88 years old, and Venus turns 3.057 years old.

Three different years-old ... same amount of time in existence.

You do realize that time is not measured by number of orbits aroundt he sun, right?

If you would like a very robust measurement of time I suggest you, again, turn to science.

In the SI system time-units (the basic one in metric is the second) are defined very specifically in a manner unrelated to planet's orbits.

Now back in the olden days it was defined by solar days, but since about 1967 it has been defined as:

[FONT=Myriad Roman,Syntax,Gill,Gill Sans,Arial,Helvetica]The second is the duration of 9 192 631 770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium 133 atom.[/FONT]

(NIST)

You can calculate other time units from this.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,305
52,681
Guam
✟5,165,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You do realize that time is not measured by number of orbits aroundt he sun, right?

If you would like a very robust measurement of time I suggest you, again, turn to science.

In the SI system time-units (the basic one in metric is the second) are defined very specifically in a manner unrelated to planet's orbits.

Now back in the olden days it was defined by solar days, but since about 1967 it has been defined as:

[FONT=Myriad Roman,Syntax,Gill,Gill Sans,Arial,Helvetica]The second is the duration of 9 192 631 770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium 133 atom.[/FONT]

(NIST)

You can calculate other time units from this.
Yes ... I'm quite familiar with the above information.
 
Upvote 0

Lucy Stulz

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2013
1,394
57
✟1,937.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Yes ... I'm quite familiar with the above information.

So why do you still try to make a point using solar days? But more importantly if one relies on solar days then why isn't it obvious how long that time is for our planet ergo you still have a stable unit of time that can be extrapolated out to any other place or time in the universe?

(Granted I would be willing to entertain the concept that "time" in the first few microseconds of the big bang was somewhat different in that space-time was still forming....but...)
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Without facts or formulas to post, you guys' true colors show; don't they?

Yes, the true colors of thinking with an open mind, thinking critically to discover the truth do shine through and quite brightly I might add.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,305
52,681
Guam
✟5,165,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So why do you still try to make a point using solar days?

If there's something I said in my post that was erroneous, please feel free to correct it.

And you're most certainly welcome to state my point for me, if you think you can do a better job.

:)
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,305
52,681
Guam
✟5,165,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Without facts or formulas to post, you guys' true colors show; don't they?
Yes, the true colors of thinking with an open mind, thinking critically to discover the truth do shine through and quite brightly I might add.
Um ... I think this can be taken more than one way. ^_^

Without facts or formulas, the truth shines through quite brightly, does it?

I've been saying that here for almost seven years now!

(Only I tend to capitalize "truth".)
 
Upvote 0

Lucy Stulz

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2013
1,394
57
✟1,937.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
If there's something I said in my post that was erroneous, please feel free to correct it.

And you're most certainly welcome to state my point for me, if you think you can do a better job.

:)

So what, exactly, does this mean?

Everytime Mars turns another year old, Earth turns 1.88 years old, and Venus turns 3.057 years old.

Three different years-old ... same amount of time in existence.

Indeed they are not three different "years old", they are the same. No matter how you wish to parse it. And since cosmology doesn't use "Martian Solar Years" as a basis but rather, for the past nearly 50 years, they've relied on SI units of time this point seems...well....pointless.

You would do much better to question "time" in a relativisitic sense, but again since we aren't publishing intergalactically yet it is probably OK to assume that when an earth scientist (you may call them e-scientists) uses a time unit it is related to how earth scientists measure time.

Your reliance on "Trips around the sun" to support your "Embedded Age Arguments" are one thing but now it seems you are trying to extrapolate out from that into other areas of science.

I just want to remind you that scientists do have a relatively robust, "planet-independent" method of measuring time.

Just a friendly FYI.
 
Upvote 0