lambslove said:
Boy are you wrong. You may not know this, but my mother and many of my family members were/are catholic, even my beloved sister. Although I believe that catholicism is frought with errors and inconsistencies, I do believe that many catholics are my brothers and sisters in Christ. The second best presentation of the gospel I ever heard was by the priest at my grandmother's funeral. He didn't speak of purgatory or anything, he made it clear, he directly stated that my grandmother was enjoying heaven at that moment because she was saved by her faith in Jesus Christ. Other experiences that I won't go into tell me with absolute certainty that my mother is also in heaven with her.
How can I be wrong when my interpretation agrees with what you believe and have stated above? The dream and its interpretation is for the Body the Church, not just you personally. I'm sorry if I projected it as exclusive to you alone. That was clumsy of me. "One who speaks in a tongue (merely) edifies himself; but one who prophesies edifies the (whole) church" 1 Cor 14:4.
lambslove said:
Likewise Jews, I embrace completed Jews as my brothers and sisters in Christ, and I don't pretend to know whether or not uncompleted Jews are saved by virtue of their Jewishness. You also probably wouldn't know, but one of my great grandmothers was a Jew.
Again, you confirm my interpretation by your affirmation of its message! Praise God! But certainly you recognize that many Christians believe Jews must accept Jesus as their "personal savior" in order to be "saved", don't you? And that they pummel the Jews with the gospel as if a club?
lambslove said:
It's the errors and inconsistencies that I have a problem with in catholicism, not the people. Whoever has saving faith in Christ is my spiritual sibling, period.
Then you of all people are exactly the correct member of the body to whom the dream is given, for you already are living its interpretation. But "God has appointed in the church first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, administrations, various kinds of tongues... All do not interpret, do they?... But one who prophesies speaks to men for edification and exhortation and consolation" 1 Cor 12:28-30; 14:3.
lambslove said:
So, your interpretation is interesting but wrong.
So, you disagree with the interpretation? You believe there is no division that causes strife in the Body of Christ in America, but that there is only a pervasive sense of love among the brethren of all flavors that overrides our differences? You disagree that many baptists hold onto the concept that the Roman Catholic Church is the harlot of Babylon, and its communicants on a wayward path? Just what exactly is it that you disagree with relative to my interpretation of your dream?
lambslove said:
The term "God's first wife" is not orthodox even to catholicism. Mary is not considered God's wife, in catholic teachings.
But my interpretation declared that Mary is the representative mother of Jesus, born out of Israel in the flesh, and as such she represents Israel, which very much is considered "God's wife." Did you miss that part of my interpretation?
lambslove said:
The only "Christian" faith that considers God to be married is Mormonism, which teaches that God marries women and girls who have never been married, because their beliefs require a woman to be married in order to achieve heaven. This is especially the point when they said, "God's first wife," because it would imply that God has more than one wife, thus excluding Mary, anyway. As it turns out, I was talking to one of my new neighbors who informed me that there is a mormon family living a block away and they have tried to give her mormon books on many occasions. So I do believe this dream was a forewarning from God to be careful.
But it is not true that the only "Christian" faith that considers God to be married is Mormonism! Any Christian who accepts the Hebrew Bible (the Old Testament) as God's Truth must recognize that God declares Israel to be his "wife"! -- "You will forget the shame of your youth, and the reproach of your widowhood you will remember no more. For
your husband is your Maker, whose name is the LORD of hosts... For the LORD has called you, like a wife forsaken and grieved in spirit, even like a wife of one's youth when she is rejected... For a brief moment I forsook you, but with great compassion I will gather you... In an outburst of anger I hid my face from you for a moment, but with everlasting kindness I will have compassion on you" Isaiah 54:4-8.
lambslove said:
So thanks again! But I am satisfied that the interpretation God gave me is correct.
Then could you do as I have done, and give the true thing each symbolic image represents in your interpretation, for all our edification? If the "nice people" are "Mormons", why are they giving you stacks and stacks of
Bibles? And if they are coming to teach you a wayward doctrine about unmarried girls marrying God, why did they point to Mary, the mother of Jesus, when she qualifies as a member of the True Wife of God, according to Isaiah the Prophet? How is that indicative of a doctrinal error? Where is the error in calling her the wife of God? She is! As a member of the collective nation of Israel!
Or else, where is the legitimacy in our claiming to be members of the Bride of Christ? -- "Now you are Christ's Body, and individually members of it" 1 Cor 12:27; "For the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ also is the head of the Church... Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the Church, and gave himself up for her... that he might present to himself the Church in all her glory, having no spot or wrinkle or any such thing... So husbands ought also to love their own wives... just as Christ also does the Church, because we are members of his body" Eph 5:23-30.
Besides, I've never heard of God giving the interpretation of a God-sent dream to the very same person he gave the dream to in the first place. But, maybe he is doing a new thing. It's possible.
Jeffrey A