- Oct 16, 2004
- 10,778
- 928
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
Ok guy. As stated, I'm not interested in your misrepresentations of my words. Enjoy.I responded to your replies directly and honestly as they spoke to me. Just as you did when you replied to my statements.
"Animal Sacrifices were implemented by God for Atonement of transgressions of HIS Law."
To which you replied;
"I don't know Chinese, so I purchase English Bibles only. Meaning, the Bible is useless if it has no language in common with me. If virtue-related words such as love, justice, merit, honesty, guilt, sin, kindness, mercy (etc) mean something different to God than to me, I have no hope."
So I have to be consistent. I must hold God to MY definition of justice, for example. In MY definition, true justice can (and often does) allow for voluntary atonement. Animal sacrifice is not a valid example of atonement since they did not volunteer.
Which to me, in my definitions, shows a religious philosophy which reduces God down to the level equal with you. A common but fatal exercise first shown in the story of Eve.
“And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat"
And again;
I posted a Biblical Reference to Zacharias.
"And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless."
to which you replied;
"Baloney. You mean to tell me they went out and tried to slaughter 7 nations like Moses and Joshua did? Again, God's specific will varies for EACH INDIVIDUAL. Hence the letter of the law will not suffice, we need the Voice."
In both cases you are projecting disbelief, not in my definition, but in the Written Word itself.
Now you are free to take your toys and go home if you want. But in my definition of "Fair, reasonable Biblical Debate" my responses were perfectly acceptable.
How is it you have come to the place where only your "definitions" count? Where only your ridicule and frankness is acceptable. Definitions that you not only hold me to, but God Himself?
You are free to believe as you wish, but me challenging your religious philosophy based on what the Word's of the Holy Scriptures say, is not cruel, or unfair, or lacking in love.
If challenging the religious philosophies of man is cruel, then Jesus Himself is a Cruel man.
Upvote
0