baptism is like an outward testimony...
So you believe baptism is for the benefit of others? A public show?
Then why was the Ethiopian, and the jailer and his family baptised in a non-public setting?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
baptism is like an outward testimony...
So you believe baptism is for the benefit of others? A public show?
Then why was the Ethiopian, and the jailer and his family baptised in a non-public setting?
So you believe baptism is for the benefit of others? A public show?
Then why was the Ethiopian, and the jailer and his family baptised in a non-public setting?
Well, maybe this might not be the case - at least on this occasion.... he got you there frog.
![]()
If I was the jailer or one of his family members, I'm not all that sure that I would be all that comfortable with walking through that town to find a pool when Paul and Silas were just recently unlawfully beaten.Really the text of Acts 16 implies the jailer may have been baptized during the nighttime even...
If I was the jailer or one of his family members, I'm not all that sure that I would be all that comfortable with walking through that town to find a pool when Paul and Silas were just recently unlawfully beaten.
So you believe baptism is for the benefit of others? A public show?
Then why was the Ethiopian, and the jailer and his family baptised in a non-public setting?
I said testimony, your choice of "show", is setting me up in a negative manner.
Well, is it a type of testimony or not?
naaaaa...
Do people confess Christ publicly and privately?
Both are valid...![]()
Well, maybe this might not be the case - at least on this occasion.
With the Philippian jailer and his family, it is difficult to imagine such a number being able to undertake a secret and unobserved baptism. Paul would had to source either a creek or pond to be able to immerse so many.
As for the Ethiopian eunuch, it would be hard to imagine such an important official travelling on his own. His supporting party would be wonderful witnesses to his conversion back in his home land.
But if one never makes a public profession of Christ there is serious cause to question their conversion.
All the more why they were either baptized in their home, or baptized at night to lessen visibility. Just speculation, or maybe not...
Acts 16:31-35 ESV
And they said, “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household.” And they spoke the word of the Lord to him and to all who were in his house. And he took them the same hour of the night and washed their wounds; and he was baptized at once, he and all his family. Then he brought them up into his house and set food before them. And he rejoiced along with his entire household that he had believed in God. But when it was day, the magistrates sent the police, saying, “Let those men go.”
Two things stick out from the text. It explicitly states they were baptized at night. It also states after they were baptized they were brought into the jailers house, so yeah, they were baptized at night out in the city or countryside somewhere with probably just his household and Paul's entourage. Maybe even some of the jailed men too, who knows... must have been in the summer...
in their home? oh my,. i doubt the bathtub afforded full emersion!All the more why they were either baptized in their home, or baptized at night to lessen visibility. Just speculation, or maybe not...
Acts 16:31-35 ESV
And they said, Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household. And they spoke the word of the Lord to him and to all who were in his house. And he took them the same hour of the night and washed their wounds; and he was baptized at once, he and all his family. Then he brought them up into his house and set food before them. And he rejoiced along with his entire household that he had believed in God. But when it was day, the magistrates sent the police, saying, Let those men go.
Two things stick out from the text. It explicitly states they were baptized at night. It also states after they were baptized they were brought into the jailers house, so yeah, they were baptized at night out in the city or countryside somewhere with probably just his household and Paul's entourage. Maybe even some of the jailed men too, who knows... must have been in the summer...
I don't believe it is. No, but this question is not directed at me so I'll let Bob answer.
If he would have wanted it observed he would have waited till the morning.Well, maybe this might not be the case - at least on this occasion.
With the Philippian jailer and his family, it is difficult to imagine such a number being able to undertake a secret and unobserved baptism. Paul would had to source either a creek or pond to be able to immerse so many.
But the eunuch's point was not to give a testimony but get baptized.As for the Ethiopian eunuch, it would be hard to imagine such an important official travelling on his own. His supporting party would be wonderful witnesses to his conversion back in his home land.
I think Frog is grasping at straws and reminding himself to rent the Martin Luther movie ...Good points.
If he would have wanted it observed he would have waited till the morning.
It was night. No light.
AC 16:29 The jailer called for lights, rushed in and fell trembling before Paul and Silas. 30 He then brought them out and asked, "Sirs, what must I do to be saved?"
AC 16:31 They replied, "Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved--you and your household." 32 Then they spoke the word of the Lord to him and to all the others in his house. 33 At that hour of the night the jailer took them and washed their wounds; then immediately he and all his family were baptized.
But the eunuch's point was not to give a testimony but get baptized.
He saw the need to do it right there and then.
If he would have wanted to give a testimony he would have told his entourage to believe in the Lord Jesus Christ.
That's a stronger testimony coming from their boss than being immersed in water.
AC 8:36 As they traveled along the road, they came to some water and the eunuch said, "Look, here is water. Why shouldn't I be baptized?" 38 And he gave orders to stop the chariot. Then both Philip and the eunuch went down into the water and Philip baptized him.
Thanks,
Ed
But what good is a private testimony when there are no people to hear it?naaaaa...
Do people confess Christ publicly and privately?
Both are valid...![]()