Dan Brooks
Active Member
- Dec 3, 2017
- 200
- 75
- 51
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
I don't believe the Bible is erroneous on anything. I think that one reason the genealogy from Adam to Christ is in there is to keep us from falling for all these erroneous beliefs: gap theory, theistic evolution, pre-Adamic races, etc. The Bible really isn't that hard to understand, right? Evening and morning being the first through sixth days, the whole first six days being reiterated in the Ten Commandments, the Old Testament genealogies, the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the doctrine of sin and death, etc etc etc, all show us the truth about creation and the nature the world we live in. If people can't believe God's Word in the first few chapters, why should they believe any other part of it? How can someone (basically) say that God's Word is completely reliable, except for those first few chapters. We all know those are just allegorical and not literally true. Well they sure better hope that Jesus isn't also an allegory!This thread seems to have grown a little quiet. Just to clarify, everyone here is under the agreement now that Adam was real and existed approximately 6,000 years ago, yes?
Adam had a sin nature, anyone here have that trait skip them? Maybe it skips a generation, I don't know...
The Bible gives the genealogy from Adam to various patriarchs as well as from Adam to Christ. Are we (Christians) saying the Bible is erroneous on this?
grin
I just really can't understand this kind of thinking. To me, someone either believes the Bible or not. We can't pick and choose what we believe in it.
Upvote
0