- Jul 18, 2017
- 251
- 73
- Country
- Germany
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Agnostic
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
the human mind could really be tricked, but for this reason there has been a true God to prevent the deceiver from tricking it, and from this perspective i can't say a human cannot distinguish one thing or another from other things
Blessings
You must be talking about the Koran. There are inserts into the Bible which were added at a much later date and were not part of the original. For example Daniel and the lions den.. and many others that were added to the originals. You must be able to understand the original meaning and what were metaphors.The only trickster in the Bible in when you listen to your own mind and do not understand the total concepts of scripture.How is a book that has hundreds of self contradictions "flawless"? How is a book that gets so much science wrong if read literally "flawless"? And I can't even begin to get into the failed prophecies here. That discussion would have to be done in the apologetics area.
Nope, but there is no helping those that blind themselves.You must be talking about the Koran. There are inserts into the Bible which were added at a much later date and were not part of the original. For example Daniel and the lions den.. and many others that were added to the originals. You must be able to understand the original meaning and what were metaphors.The only trickster in the Bible in when you listen to your own mind and do not understand the total concepts of scripture.
You must be talking about the Koran. There are inserts into the Bible which were added at a much later date and were not part of the original. For example Daniel and the lions den.. and many others that were added to the originals. You must be able to understand the original meaning and what were metaphors.The only trickster in the Bible in when you listen to your own mind and do not understand the total concepts of scripture.
Not so. Anything which has recognisable significance needs accounting for.
It may say "Calvinist," below my avatar, but you are the one who brought up the subject of a designer. There is no shortage of scientists, who are atheists, and to whom the universe looks like a "fix," to borrow a term used by one of them.
And you introduced a second straw man, nice
If the physics were different, who's to say that different forms of life could not have arisen?Some of the physics of this universe seems to be preprogrammed to create life. What is your favourite argument against such a line of thought? You can mention several arguments of course but I would like to know which one you prefere.
How is a book that has hundreds of self contradictions "flawless"? How is a book that gets so much science wrong if read literally "flawless"? And I can't even begin to get into the failed prophecies here. That discussion would have to be done in the apologetics area.
If the physics were different, who's to say that different forms of life could not have arisen?
The WAP says nothing about the degree of fine tuning, nor does it define the problem away.I feel very bad about the antropic principle. You could find evidence of an incredible amount of fine tuning and it could still not be disproven. It defines the problem of fine tuning away which is not a proper way to discuss nor a sign of curiosity.
What would you expect a universe without 'finely-tuned' parameters to look like, and what sort of values would its parameters have?Even if no life existed in the universe, some kind of intelligencies looking on from outside would still see something which looked incredibly finely tuned.
What would you expect a universe without 'finely-tuned' parameters to look like, and what sort of values would its parameters have?
The WAP says nothing about the degree of fine tuning, nor does it define the problem away.
Lol - you might as well say you find 1 + 1 = 2 to be stupid.I find the antropic principle stupid now...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?