Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, they aren't.Once again I will point out that the process is no different between micro and macro evolution. If you accept that micro evolution happens, then you can't deny macro evolution. Once again, the processes are the same.
No, they aren't.
The alleged emergence of genera throws a monkey wrench into the works.
No [new] genus has ever appeared on the Earth since Genesis 1, unless God did it.
The alleged emergence of genera throws a monkey wrench into the works.
Deep time.Would you care to tell me what process happens in macroevolution that does not happen in microevolution?
"Genus" is Satan's cheap imitation for "kind".A genus is just an arbitrary human classification.
I'm sure you're familiar with my list of his Arab phones:...
What a random response. You are definitely master of the non-sequitur.
If that's a random response, I'm Genghis Khan.
Either that, or it explains where those barriers are found.It's random because it has absolutely nothing to do with the topic of conversation which was the suggestion biological barriers in nature.
In other words, a coyote's* barrier stops with the domestic dog.**
Try cross-kinding a giraffe with an armadillo and see if there's a barrier.
* I don't know which is higher on the chain, a coyote or a wolf, but hopefully you get my point.
** I don't know which is lower on the chain, a domestic dog or a dingo, but hopefully you get my point.
Don't know.Okay, let's explore this: biologically-speaking, what is the actual barrier in this instance?
Whatever all that meant.pitabread said:What this is effectively talking about is barriers between gene pools via non-viable reproduction. But we already know that that can occur in nature (e.g. speciation).
It has to stop at some species, doesn't it?pitabread said:Are you suggesting speciation is a barrier to evolution? Because we can actively see it occur in nature. Speciation is not a barrier for evolution.
Well I even googled it, and it's over my head -- which I expected.pitabread said:What "chain" are you talking about?
Deep time.
And God is a god of boundaries, and He has set a boundary that evolution cannot pass.
If it does, the "culprit" is sterile or doesn't live long or whatever.
Of course not ... since it doesn't exist.But you can't show that deep time, as you call it, doesn't exist...
Is that why?Now, now, AV, you can't say something is Satanic just because you don't like it.
Of course not ... since it doesn't exist.
Let's start with you.So? If there is no deep time, then we live in a young universe, and you should be able to show us things that only exist in a young universe.
Let's start with you.
By comparison, you're young.
We've got a couple of trees we planted that are young.
Oh, sorry ... I misunderstood you.Please demonstrate how Kylie is only possible in a young universe, not an old one.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?