James1979 said:
Yes of course when God gave Abraham that gift to have faith, believe, trust it's all the same thing, it belonged to Abraham. I never said that the faith that Abraham received from God was Christ faith, I simply said that Abraham was justified(saved) by the faith of Christ and the finish work that Christ had completed to save Abraham and the rest of the true believers.
This could just be semantics then. But again, let's let the Bible express it for us:
Romans 3:28
For we maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from works of the Law.
Whose faith is in view here, Christ's or the individual's? Before answering consider the following:
Romans 4:2-3
For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. For what does the Scripture say? "ABRAHAM BELIEVED GOD, AND IT WAS CREDITED TO HIM AS RIGHTEOUSNESS."
It seems that in Romans 3 & 4 that it is talking about the specific individual's faith, which we all agree is a gift of God, not the 'faith of Christ'. That is, we are not justified by Christ's faith or faithfulness to His Father, but as a result of our faith receiving Christ's atoning work.
Abraham was not justified by his ability to believed God from the gift that he received from God.
Yes and no. Abraham was justified as a result of believing in the promises of God... the ability to do so was a gift of God, but it was none-the-less "Abraham's faith."
The Bible states that "Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness", thus is was Abraham's believing by which the credit became his.
I
use to believe this too, but the thing is that God has written the bible for those who will offend, to stumble and to easily misunderstand what God is really saying. On the other hand God has written the bible in parables so that his people will be able to receive the truth while others cannot see or hear his word. I hope this helps
No this doesn't help, I think nearly everyone in the Reformation thread will agree with this last statment of yours, however, this sheds no light on the exegesis you're attempting to provide. On what grammatical and contextual basis are you saying what you're saying?