This guy says eating meat "not that its right"-he's not saying its a sin, but I guess he's saying it's not really right. Do you think it makes sense bibically?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This guy says eating meat "not that its right"-he's not saying its a sin, but I guess he's saying it's not really right. Do you think it makes sense bibically?
I'd point out that vegetarianism and veganism are not the same things.
However, Jesus--being an observant Jew-- ate meat.
I don't believe it's sinful to eat meat in the sense of it being a sinful act. After all, God allowed his people in the OT to eat certain kinds of clean animals and fish. However, eating meat didn't seem to be a part of God's original plan before the fall. So perhaps eating meat is more of a sinful state because of living in a fallen world.
Perhaps it would be spiritually better to not eat meat in that sense. Or even simply for health reasons.
Not sinful-but "not right".
Since you're making a distinction between "sin" and "not right," what do you see as the distinction? Is this by some moral authority in addition to God or, for that matter, superior to God? If God has no problem with an action but it's still "not right," is that not implying a superior moral authority above God?
Of course it's right. Jesus helped his own Apostles catch and eat fish. In Luke 22 and 24 he ate lamb and fish himself. And in the miracle of the loaves and fishes, he ordered his followers to distribute fish to the crowd that had come to hear him preach so that they wouldn't go hungry..
This guy says eating meat "not that its right"-he's not saying its a sin, but I guess he's saying it's not really right. Do you think it makes sense bibically?
Certain acts are definitely wrong. The ten commandments list some of them. Eating meat is not wrong, however.
Are things like bestiality and animal sacrifices wrong just due to perversion and ungodly spirituality being wrong, or also because they are acts of animal abuse?
God commanded His people to make offerings and in some instances people received a portion back to eat at the Lord's table, such as with the peace offering, so again there are no biblical grounds for saying that this is wrong. While animal abuse is wrong, this was not animal abuse and steps were taken to ensure that the animal died quickly and painlessly.
Is animal abuse partially the reason those sins punishable by death in OT law were wrong?
Many of God's Laws invite us to ponder why God commanded them, so it is perfectly reasonable to think that animal abuse was part of the reason why God commanded against beasility. Sex is a wonderful gift from God, but it is a gift that can easily be abused, so God gave instructions for our own good for how to correctly use it.